VS Cars going head to head!

1997 CAMARO VS 1985 CAMARO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 12:53 PM
  #21  
94Z28interceptor's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 125
From:
Default RE: 1997 CAMARO VS 1985 CAMARO

lol good job and nice kill... your winning probly comes down to the fact that his car is so much older. it is carburated and just a big engine. he probly had a little more raw power, but yours is just newer with newer technology involved. ie fuel injection, suspension and such. ha wheres "OMGLS1" ? if you beat an 85z 350by a car and a half, dont ya think a 94Z would murder an 86? i guess he dont. "dont get cocky" LOL ok buddy
 
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 01:21 AM
  #22  
coprunr's Avatar
2nd Gear member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 343
From:
Default RE: 1997 CAMARO VS 1985 CAMARO

the 85 IROC was a turd ,but they wereTPIin 85. but the EFI on those sucked.even when new. the 87 up cars are a different animal. i have played with afew and they respond VERY well to basic bolt ons. i have also seen those cars go from 245hp to 275 with just a fuel pressure change. one thing to always watch in a 3rd gen is if it has a 5 spd , it's a 5.0. the 5.7 never had a 5 spd behind it in thrid gen cars.
 
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 08:06 PM
  #23  
350DREAMS's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 156
From:
Default RE: 1997 CAMARO VS 1985 CAMARO

torque is everything
 
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 11:49 PM
  #24  
BigNic's Avatar
4' 11" 117 lbs of fury!
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,441
Default RE: 1997 CAMARO VS 1985 CAMARO

congrads congrads bet he feels dumb oh and 94z28interceptor you dont have to be right to be cold thats just not true thats like saying you have be be wrong to be a jerk its not what you say its how you say it but congrads dows
 
Old Mar 4, 2007 | 02:15 AM
  #25  
94Z28interceptor's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 125
From:
Default RE: 1997 CAMARO VS 1985 CAMARO

lmao yes you do! u just make yourself look dumb when you violently throw out incorrect info like that.. thats like someone saying for example, "the LT1 is a 350," and then someone saying "no way man, the LT1 was a 346, and i think i know more than you." that is in NO way cold because the person who said that has just made everyone a little dumber, and made themselves look... well whatever. lol i cant even believe it...
Don't get cocky, you didn't kill him, he was right on your bumper by about half a car....
OMGLS1 i just have one question for you too.. are you that good that you can guess exactly how it would turn out between a 94 Z28 and and 86 IROC without hardly knowing anything about the 94 and ABSOLUTELY nothing about the Iroc? man, i wish i could be as good as you.i have no further questions. haha
 
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 11:52 AM
  #26  
94Z28interceptor's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 125
From:
Default RE: 1997 CAMARO VS 1985 CAMARO

ORIGINAL: coprunr

the 85 IROC was a turd ,but they wereTPIin 85. but the EFI on those sucked.even when new. the 87 up cars are a different animal. i have played with afew and they respond VERY well to basic bolt ons. i have also seen those cars go from 245hp to 275 with just a fuel pressure change. one thing to always watch in a 3rd gen is if it has a 5 spd , it's a 5.0. the 5.7 never had a 5 spd behind it in thrid gen cars.
i found this onhttp://www.camarosource.ca/php/camar..._2&bmid=12 : 85 Camaro Production stats: 36.5% were equipped with a V8 engine with a carburetor, 18.2% were equipped with a fuel-injected V8 engine, 43.5% were equipped with a V6 engine, and1.8% were equipped with a 4 cylinder engine.

but u are right about the 5.7 not having a 5 speed. they were all auto
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
My85Camaro
82-92 General
9
Nov 12, 2011 09:41 PM
travis.joeris
General Tech
3
Nov 7, 2011 01:34 PM
cwolfc
82-92 General
10
Apr 29, 2009 06:33 AM
paycheck0171
New Members Area
10
Dec 3, 2008 10:09 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:43 PM.