07 Mustink KILL
but thanks for takin the comment lightly
#23
09-03-2007 | 08:35 PM
4th Gear Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,687
RE: 07 Mustink KILL
ORIGINAL: rockin85
sounds to me that everyone hear knows more about mustangs than camaros
sounds to me that everyone hear knows more about mustangs than camaros
#24
09-03-2007 | 09:23 PM
2nd Gear member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 430
From:
RE: 07 Mustink KILL
hey i cancrack jokes every now and then. besides its not just fords that are the enemy, you got hondas, acuras, dodge, and alot of others. i personally dont like the civics. they sound like crap no matter what you do to them,and they look dumb.
#25
09-03-2007 | 10:19 PM
3rd Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 879
RE: 07 Mustink KILL
ORIGINAL: SpecterGT260
nope, in order to make the comparison we made, we have to know about both. sounds like the early posters just dont know anything about mustangs [8D]
nope, in order to make the comparison we made, we have to know about both. sounds like the early posters just dont know anything about mustangs [8D]
#26
09-04-2007 | 12:14 AM
Ninja Administrator
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,172
From: Potato
RE: 07 Mustink KILL
(u get 3 of those because... well.... uhggg...)IF everything you posted was correct then you arent included in the that group. and if you look back ull see i agreed with/backed you up on your comments. it was mostly the "new GT runs mid 14's" guys i was referring to
#27
09-04-2007 | 12:19 AM
NOOO they be stealin' my bucket
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,200
From: Fort Brag NC (no longer in iraq)
ROTM Winner's Club
RE: 07 Mustink KILL
Thishasrunway off topic.So i thinkin short every onethat has postedis kind of right in there own ways. It comes down to elevation, temp, humidity, driver, track and a lot more crap that could go on and on. In short it could happen a LT1 could take out a stock 3 vavle GT giving the conditions are in the LT's favor or the GT's driver cant drive. IS THAT FAIR
#28
09-04-2007 | 12:25 AM
NOOO they be stealin' my bucket
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,200
From: Fort Brag NC (no longer in iraq)
ROTM Winner's Club
RE: 07 Mustink KILL
And the damn things do run low 14s where im at. Yes NC sucks. But to be fair the stock LS2 vettes run high 12s(12.8s 12.9s)and stock LS1 Fbodys run mid 13s on normal days here. As stated above i know there are guys runing freaky 13.1s and better in stock LS1s and i know there are a few LS2 vette guys runing down into the Mid 12s in some places. Just not here in a normal hot day. Im sure at sea level and on a cool day its posible to pull off some time im just posting what i know and see from here.
#29
09-04-2007 | 06:28 AM
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 168
From: McCaysville, GA
RE: 07 Mustink KILL
Ok look all I know is I beat him (know you all herd this) a win is a winwether its a second or a mile. I don't understand why people are trying to discredit me by over analyzing it. Its that what we do here at CF is try to discredit our Camaro brothers, look in side yourself, see if thereal issue is not with my car beating a mustang but with your uncomfort towards somethingthats is uncommon, but not intangelble.The excat racing conditions: Dry out side,im suregiving the age of the mustanghehad brand new tires,andfrom the smell he rode the clutch bad. Me: Ihave really bald reartire almost smooth(stupid burnouts),recent full car tuneup. Now lets look at the facts: Mustang 300 SAE hp @ 5,750 stock, 320 ft/lbs@(not sure) and weighs 3700 with two passengers 200 lbs each. Camaro 275 SAE+ 30hp for little mods = 305 hp@ 5000, 325 ft/lbs @ 2000and weighs 3740 with two passengers 200 lbs each. These cars are evenly match and it comes down to road conditons and drivers. How is it not likely and not possible. Took awhile I had to look everything up.
#30
09-05-2007 | 10:00 AM
3rd Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,184
From:
RE: 07 Mustink KILL
ORIGINAL: chrshadil
Ok look all I know is I beat him (know you all herd this) a win is a winwether its a second or a mile. I don't understand why people are trying to discredit me by over analyzing it. Its that what we do here at CF is try to discredit our Camaro brothers, look in side yourself, see if thereal issue is not with my car beating a mustang but with your uncomfort towards somethingthats is uncommon, but not intangelble.The excat racing conditions: Dry out side,im suregiving the age of the mustanghehad brand new tires,andfrom the smell he rode the clutch bad. Me: Ihave really bald reartire almost smooth(stupid burnouts),recent full car tuneup. Now lets look at the facts: Mustang 300 SAE hp @ 5,750 stock, 320 ft/lbs@(not sure) and weighs 3700 with two passengers 200 lbs each. Camaro 275 SAE+ 30hp for little mods = 305 hp@ 5000, 325 ft/lbs @ 2000and weighs 3740 with two passengers 200 lbs each. These cars are evenly match and it comes down to road conditons and drivers. How is it not likely and not possible. Took awhile I had to look everything up.
Ok look all I know is I beat him (know you all herd this) a win is a winwether its a second or a mile. I don't understand why people are trying to discredit me by over analyzing it. Its that what we do here at CF is try to discredit our Camaro brothers, look in side yourself, see if thereal issue is not with my car beating a mustang but with your uncomfort towards somethingthats is uncommon, but not intangelble.The excat racing conditions: Dry out side,im suregiving the age of the mustanghehad brand new tires,andfrom the smell he rode the clutch bad. Me: Ihave really bald reartire almost smooth(stupid burnouts),recent full car tuneup. Now lets look at the facts: Mustang 300 SAE hp @ 5,750 stock, 320 ft/lbs@(not sure) and weighs 3700 with two passengers 200 lbs each. Camaro 275 SAE+ 30hp for little mods = 305 hp@ 5000, 325 ft/lbs @ 2000and weighs 3740 with two passengers 200 lbs each. These cars are evenly match and it comes down to road conditons and drivers. How is it not likely and not possible. Took awhile I had to look everything up.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
