82-92 V8 Tech V8 Camaro General Topics.

I'm at a loss 92Z28

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 9, 2015 | 01:54 PM
  #11  
Marc Pierce's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Newbie
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 13
Default Idk

Originally Posted by Everett#2390
If tape looks permanent, leave it on.
If it looks like shipping tape used for protection, take it off.
idk but still no fire . New coil, distributor, rotor, pickup coil, ignition module ,plugs and wires and still no fire
 
Old Oct 9, 2015 | 02:24 PM
  #12  
Camaro 69's Avatar
Senior Moderator
January 2010 ROTM Winner
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 18,306
From: The 'Burbs of Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by Marc Pierce
I put starter fluid in it and it attempted to run for a split second
I don't know why you're chasing the ignition, when it's clearly a fuel (or lack thereof) issue. Did you check to make sure your injectors are firing, as I suggested earlier? You posted no follow up to that test.
 
Old Oct 9, 2015 | 03:56 PM
  #13  
Marc Pierce's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Newbie
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 13
Default

Originally Posted by Camaro 69
I don't know why you're chasing the ignition, when it's clearly a fuel (or lack thereof) issue. Did you check to make sure your injectors are firing, as I suggested earlier? You posted no follow up to that test.
How is it fuel issue if the coil tested bad the distributor cap was bad the pickup coil tested bad and I'm still not getting fire . I have the correct fuel pressure at the rail and the injectors tested ok? I don't get it
 

Last edited by Marc Pierce; Oct 9, 2015 at 04:00 PM. Reason: Not finished
Old Oct 9, 2015 | 04:19 PM
  #14  
Camaro 69's Avatar
Senior Moderator
January 2010 ROTM Winner
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 18,306
From: The 'Burbs of Chicago
Default

Fuel + spark = fire. If you're getting no spark, you never said so. But you must be getting something, since the engine fires up momentarily with starting fluid. You would get nothing if you had no spark.
I know you cleaned the injectors, but did you test them all to see that they are getting an electrical signal while cranking the engine over? They can be as clean as a whistle, but that does no good if they're not being told to open and close. I didn't see the follow up to that test, if you did it.
 
Old Oct 10, 2015 | 09:13 PM
  #15  
Marc Pierce's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Newbie
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 13
Default

Originally Posted by Camaro 69
Fuel + spark = fire. If you're getting no spark, you never said so. But you must be getting something, since the engine fires up momentarily with starting fluid. You would get nothing if you had no spark.
I know you cleaned the injectors, but did you test them all to see that they are getting an electrical signal while cranking the engine over? They can be as clean as a whistle, but that does no good if they're not being told to open and close. I didn't see the follow up to that test, if you did it.
Ok no power to the injectors but correct fuel pressure to the rail. And no spark I've replaced the ecm aswell
 
Old Oct 11, 2015 | 06:29 AM
  #16  
Everett#2390's Avatar
4th Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,595
From: Va. Beach, VA
Default

No power to injectors, does this mean:
no battery power through INJ fuse(s) to one wire on injector connector?
Other wire on injector connector has no control power from ECM -voltage goes high-low-high-low, etc, when cranking?
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JaySan
93-02 V6 Tech
29
Dec 2, 2006 08:37 PM
gijoe985
General Tech
1
Oct 13, 2006 11:58 PM
auSStin
VS
6
Sep 25, 2006 01:45 PM
Z28man
LT1/LT4 Tech
3
Jun 24, 2006 03:49 PM
z28pete
LT1/LT4 Tech
4
Jan 25, 2006 07:54 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03 AM.