305 with 350 heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 20, 2019 | 08:22 PM
  #1  
Joshua Thomas Crouser's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Newbie
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 3
From: Castle rock Colorado
Default 305 with 350 heads

Hey y’all so I’m building a 305 I bought for $200 and I’m putting 350 heads on it which I know will lower my compression but get a higher revin motor out of it. But I need to know a way to up my compression back up so it doesn’t run terribly. Any suggestions for cheap?
 
Old Jan 20, 2019 | 09:44 PM
  #2  
Gorn's Avatar
Fourth Generation Moderator
October 2009 ROTM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 10,560
From: Eastern PA,
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

You paid too much for the motor, the 305 is a very weak motor. They tend to spin rod bearings in the TPI engines. At the dealer I worked at we could see 2 a month and I have seen them with 7 of the 8 rod bearings spun and that was on stock engines under warranty. If I had to guess I have scrapped 2 dozen 305's back in the day for people upgrading to 350s. In the 80's you could not sell a 305 even with low miles. On the other hand the L98 350 had way more torque and I never saw one with a spun bearing. If you get much more than 250 HP on a 305 it will have a short life unless you baby it. Everyone I knew that tried to make a 305 fast ended up with a scrapped motor. At one point I asked a GM engineer how to fix the 305, He said the issue was the block flexing. The 305 was designed to be as light as possible to improve MPG and there is no fix.

On the other hand you could go buy a 4.8 with high miles for around $300, pull it apart clean it and put in a new oil pump and you have a motor that can handle 600-700 HP.
 
Old Jan 20, 2019 | 10:55 PM
  #3  
Joshua Thomas Crouser's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Newbie
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 3
From: Castle rock Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by Gorn
You paid too much for the motor, the 305 is a very weak motor. They tend to spin rod bearings in the TPI engines. At the dealer I worked at we could see 2 a month and I have seen them with 7 of the 8 rod bearings spun and that was on stock engines under warranty. If I had to guess I have scrapped 2 dozen 305's back in the day for people upgrading to 350s. In the 80's you could not sell a 305 even with low miles. On the other hand the L98 350 had way more torque and I never saw one with a spun bearing. If you get much more than 250 HP on a 305 it will have a short life unless you baby it. Everyone I knew that tried to make a 305 fast ended up with a scrapped motor. At one point I asked a GM engineer how to fix the 305, He said the issue was the block flexing. The 305 was designed to be as light as possible to improve MPG and there is no fix.

On the other hand you could go buy a 4.8 with high miles for around $300, pull it apart clean it and put in a new oil pump and you have a motor that can handle 600-700 HP.
yeah that’s what I heard but this one came out of a late 70’s el Camino so luckily it’s a carb one instead of a tpi.
 
Old Jan 21, 2019 | 06:30 PM
  #4  
MKCoconuts's Avatar
4th Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,553
From: PA
Default

It's still a 305. I wouldn't give a nickel for one. You can find 350s every where for a few hundred more and you're money ahead at that point.

If you're dead set on using the 305 with the 350 heads, easiest way to raise compression is to have the heads shaved and/or dome pistons and/or thinner head gasket. In either case, you have to check piston to valve clearance. You also have to make sure you don't go too nuts or you may end requiring to use 93 or better fuel...especially if you use steel heads.
 
Old Jan 21, 2019 | 07:09 PM
  #5  
Y2Keglide's Avatar
4th Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,247
From: Yacolt,WA
Default

Originally Posted by MKCoconuts
It's still a 305. I wouldn't give a nickel for one. You can find 350s every where for a few hundred more and you're money ahead at that point.
.
Ditto! Sell that boat anchor to someone who needs a motor and get a 350.
 
Old Jan 22, 2019 | 01:04 PM
  #6  
Joshua Thomas Crouser's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Newbie
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 3
From: Castle rock Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by MKCoconuts
It's still a 305. I wouldn't give a nickel for one. You can find 350s every where for a few hundred more and you're money ahead at that point.

If you're dead set on using the 305 with the 350 heads, easiest way to raise compression is to have the heads shaved and/or dome pistons and/or thinner head gasket. In either case, you have to check piston to valve clearance. You also have to make sure you don't go too nuts or you may end requiring to use 93 or better fuel...especially if you use steel heads.
Yes sir thank you. I already have bought 2 engines (both for really cheap) so I’m just gonna stick with the 305 for now. And yup just going to do a few things so I can get it to around 260-300 and I’ll be good. Thank you.
 
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 02:54 PM
  #7  
Gorn's Avatar
Fourth Generation Moderator
October 2009 ROTM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 10,560
From: Eastern PA,
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

Just a FYI the 305 casting design is the same start to finish. There is no "better" 305. This block was designed in the early to mid 70's with one goal, be light as possible so GM could save MPG. The original motors only had 140 HP so the light weight did not matter. The failures started in high volume as GM used that same block on their 220 HP TPI engine. So don't think that the lower HP blocks are better think of it as the TPI engines showing you the limit of the 305 block.

Also keep in mind there are a lot of variations in castings. While some TPI engine did not make it out of warranty many are still running today. But as I said before, everyone that I know that tried to go fast in a 305 broke or spun a rod. I am sorry to say that include myself and a 1984 305 HO Camaro
 

Last edited by Gorn; Jan 26, 2019 at 02:58 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shaggy
82-92 V8 Tech
4
Mar 25, 2014 03:13 AM
Badrs2810
82-92 V8 Tech
20
May 28, 2010 05:07 PM
CamaroKid81
Engine & Internal
12
Mar 10, 2007 03:40 AM
ScottD
82-92 General
27
Nov 25, 2006 09:16 PM
JoshZ28
82-92 General
17
Nov 18, 2006 10:59 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:20 PM.