Need help with carb set up on 400 sbc

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 13, 2012 | 01:54 PM
  #1  
2ndgenchris's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Newbie
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 16
From: Parma, Ohio
Default Need help with carb set up on 400 sbc

Have a 400, bored .30 over. It's cammed, has headers, etc. Max rpm of the engine is a little over 6500. Has a holley 750 in it currently, is it too big, too small? Want the best set up.
 
Old Nov 13, 2012 | 02:52 PM
  #2  
YAV8's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 242
Default

2 bolt or 4 bolt block? What cam do you have? What cylinder heads? What is the rod length. You realley need a good 406 with alot of the RIGHT PARTS to spin that thing over 6500.
 
Old Nov 13, 2012 | 03:02 PM
  #3  
2ndgenchris's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Newbie
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 16
From: Parma, Ohio
Default

To be honest with you i'm not real sure, just know that driving or reving it in park the tach registers 6500 rpm.. dads project went over to me and i don't know too many specifics.
 
Old Nov 13, 2012 | 03:10 PM
  #4  
2ndgenchris's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Newbie
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 16
From: Parma, Ohio
Default

Ok, just figured out it is a 4 bolt.
 
Old Nov 13, 2012 | 08:44 PM
  #5  
1971BB427's Avatar
Second Generation Moderator
Feb 2010 ROTM winner
Jan 2013 ROTM winner
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 9,097
From: Portland, Or
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

Really irrelevant as to whether it's 2 bolt, 4 bolt, or what rod length, etc. It's a .030" over 400, so the only other concern I would really have is what type of cam, heads, and rear gear ratio it is using. If you don't have specifics, then I'd play it safe and go with a 650 Holley with vacuum secondaries. It should provide enough fuel without overcarbureting the engine.
But I would question the tachometer's accuracy? If you're holding the throttle long enough to really rev that 400 to 6500 rpm's, then it better be really well built! That big 400 wont take a lot of 6500 rpm hits if it's not a super strong lower end. I'd keep it under 6,000 and really more like 5500 most the time!
 
Old Nov 13, 2012 | 09:13 PM
  #6  
YAV8's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 242
Default

The 2 bolt 400 block are stronger then the 4 bolt blocks because of the webbing, just the nature of the 400 block. Rod length also plays a big part in how long the motor will last. The stock 5.56 short rod motor was never designed for a lot of rpm. Most everyone steps up to the 5.7 rod lenght motors and if you really want to wing it the 6 inch rod with splayed caps is the only way to go. You also need a good set of heads to feed those cubic inches, stock heads even with bigger valves is still just a truck motor. The best setup for the least amount of money spent is the 406 with 5.7 rods (be sure there clipped the rod bolts to clear the cam) and a set of ported vortec heads. For the cam the comp. EX-274 and a 750 carb and shift at 5800 rpms. The only thing that KILLS a motor is RPMs.
 
Old Nov 14, 2012 | 10:29 AM
  #7  
1971BB427's Avatar
Second Generation Moderator
Feb 2010 ROTM winner
Jan 2013 ROTM winner
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 9,097
From: Portland, Or
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

Originally Posted by YAV8
The 2 bolt 400 block are stronger then the 4 bolt blocks because of the webbing, just the nature of the 400 block. Rod length also plays a big part in how long the motor will last. The stock 5.56 short rod motor was never designed for a lot of rpm. Most everyone steps up to the 5.7 rod lenght motors and if you really want to wing it the 6 inch rod with splayed caps is the only way to go. You also need a good set of heads to feed those cubic inches, stock heads even with bigger valves is still just a truck motor. The best setup for the least amount of money spent is the 406 with 5.7 rods (be sure there clipped the rod bolts to clear the cam) and a set of ported vortec heads. For the cam the comp. EX-274 and a 750 carb and shift at 5800 rpms. The only thing that KILLS a motor is RPMs.
All good info, but it still doesn't have a lot to do with his choice of carburetor, as his original question asked.
 
Old Nov 14, 2012 | 10:43 AM
  #8  
Camaro 69's Avatar
Senior Moderator
January 2010 ROTM Winner
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 18,306
From: The 'Burbs of Chicago
Default

The simple answer is....based on the c.i. and stated rpm limit, the 750 is a good size for your 400.
 
Old Nov 14, 2012 | 11:46 AM
  #9  
2ndgenchris's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Newbie
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 16
From: Parma, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by Camaro 69
The simple answer is....based on the c.i. and stated rpm limit, the 750 is a good size for your 400.
Thanks for an answer! I'll learn specifics when I get a hold of my dad.. just know everything is built on it to allow it to run that high of rpms. Think the gears are like 4:30's.
 
Old Nov 14, 2012 | 03:34 PM
  #10  
YAV8's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 242
Default

Originally Posted by 1971BB427
All good info, but it still doesn't have a lot to do with his choice of carburetor, as his original question asked.
Your right on all counts. BUT if your trying to spin 6500 with a short rodded stock 400 assembley, you will probley be driving over the bottom end no matter what carb you have on. Once you woofumm big time, their mostly junk and hardly worth the time or money to fix. But yes the 750 vac. secondarys would be a good choice.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
carguylt1
LT1/LT4 Tech
5
Mar 28, 2011 10:30 AM
white85camaro
Intake, Headers, and Exhaust
6
Jul 29, 2010 05:16 PM
cadfleet
70-81 General
6
Jul 6, 2010 10:28 PM
albo1989
82-92 V8 Tech
3
Jul 1, 2010 07:40 PM
Gordon24Camaro
82-92 General
10
Jan 11, 2007 10:46 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:48 PM.