heads
#11
http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/te...-fastburn.html
#12
Here is a afr vs ported bow tie test. Its not shocking that its all over but the crying after 4grand.
http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/te...dyno_test.html
CHP did a full test of about every head available. They also broke it down into runner vol. I was content that my Canfields were in second or third. I'll try and find that article.
http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/te...dyno_test.html
CHP did a full test of about every head available. They also broke it down into runner vol. I was content that my Canfields were in second or third. I'll try and find that article.
#13
^ Yes it is interesting to note in that CHP dyno comparison how the AFR heads overtake the GM's above 4k rpm. And AFR's literally kill them at the high rpm's. GM's are slightly better in the low rpm range, but since my engine is still loafing at 4k rpm, I would opt for AFR for overall performance. Others may find a benefit with the GM heads, if their engine doesn't spend much time that far above 4k. But the difference in the lower range isn't exactly earth shattering.
Last edited by Camaro 69; 11-09-2010 at 01:33 PM.
#16
ive been also curious on the partriot heads. The local speed shop where im from said that there pretty good heads for there price, but i havent heard from anyone who has used them.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kuhlman187
67-69 V8 Tech
4
02-12-2015 08:14 AM