raced an 00 mustang gt
93 GT AUTO 16.0
91 GT 15.4
95 3800 camaro 15.7
97 3800 firebird 15.5
05 GT 13.7
03-04 SC SVT 12.8
99 to 04 GT 13.9-14.3
96 to 98 tend to run a little slower with around 225-235HP but still in the mid to high 14s. Some guys have run veary low 15s.
The 2.8 is around 135HP the 3.1 is around 150HP and both are high 16 low 17 second cars if i am not mistaken.
91 GT 15.4
95 3800 camaro 15.7
97 3800 firebird 15.5
05 GT 13.7
03-04 SC SVT 12.8
99 to 04 GT 13.9-14.3
96 to 98 tend to run a little slower with around 225-235HP but still in the mid to high 14s. Some guys have run veary low 15s.
The 2.8 is around 135HP the 3.1 is around 150HP and both are high 16 low 17 second cars if i am not mistaken.
This is based on all vehicles being in good mechanical condition with equal drivers. Fill free to judge as much as your little heart can handle. 
3.8 Vs. GT 99-04
from this I think it is safe to say a 2000 GT can take down a 3.8 with out breaking a nail. Around a second and a half in the quarter is a big difference in distance I don’t see this happening at the track or on the street [>:]
3.8 vs. GT 96-98
this could be closer with the GT having a good advantage. Maybe if condition where right for the F-body it’s a long shot but this could happen on the street but most likely not. At the track the stang will most likely take the V6. [:@]
3.1 VS carbureted 5.0
this is a big power difference 150 vs. 200 and the torque difference is going to be around 125 foot pounds in the stangs favor. I don’t see this happing on the street or track. [>:]
3.8 vs. 5.0 FI
this is a good race the stang has a little HP and torque over the F-body but it’s going to come down to driver, car set up, auto vs. Manuel. On the road this could be an easy kill for the V6 and might even hold its own at the track.

3.8 Vs. GT 99-04
from this I think it is safe to say a 2000 GT can take down a 3.8 with out breaking a nail. Around a second and a half in the quarter is a big difference in distance I don’t see this happening at the track or on the street [>:]
3.8 vs. GT 96-98
this could be closer with the GT having a good advantage. Maybe if condition where right for the F-body it’s a long shot but this could happen on the street but most likely not. At the track the stang will most likely take the V6. [:@]
3.1 VS carbureted 5.0
this is a big power difference 150 vs. 200 and the torque difference is going to be around 125 foot pounds in the stangs favor. I don’t see this happing on the street or track. [>:]
3.8 vs. 5.0 FI
this is a good race the stang has a little HP and torque over the F-body but it’s going to come down to driver, car set up, auto vs. Manuel. On the road this could be an easy kill for the V6 and might even hold its own at the track.
ORIGINAL: cbr600rx7
3.1 VS carbureted 5.0
this is a big power difference 150 vs. 200 and the torque difference is going to be around 125 foot pounds in the stangs favor. I don’t see this happing on the street or track. [>:]
3.1 VS carbureted 5.0
this is a big power difference 150 vs. 200 and the torque difference is going to be around 125 foot pounds in the stangs favor. I don’t see this happing on the street or track. [>:]
)
ORIGINAL: cbr600rx7
3.8 vs. 5.0 FI
this is a good race the stang has a little HP and torque over the F-body but it’s going to come down to driver, car set up, auto vs. Manuel. On the road this could be an easy kill for the V6 and might even hold its own at the track.
3.8 vs. 5.0 FI
this is a good race the stang has a little HP and torque over the F-body but it’s going to come down to driver, car set up, auto vs. Manuel. On the road this could be an easy kill for the V6 and might even hold its own at the track.


