ANOTHER WIN FOR THE CAMAROS!
#11
RE: ANOTHER WIN FOR THE CAMAROS!
ORIGINAL: 02StanGT
Ten to twelve thousand pounds? I highly doubt it. Perhaps you meant 3 to 4 tons. That would make more sense.
ORIGINAL: itcantbestephen
Suburbans are probably closer to like 5 or 6 tons. I had an '89 lwb Silverado with a 350tbi in it, it could move pretty well for a stock 17 year old (at the time, it got stolen August of '06) truck, lots of torque.
Suburbans are probably closer to like 5 or 6 tons. I had an '89 lwb Silverado with a 350tbi in it, it could move pretty well for a stock 17 year old (at the time, it got stolen August of '06) truck, lots of torque.
#12
RE: ANOTHER WIN FOR THE CAMAROS!
ORIGINAL: 1990CamaroRS
my '97 Suburban (affectionately named Sherman, after the tank) was 6,340 lbs dry without anyone in it. they're beasts, but they can still get up and go
ORIGINAL: 02StanGT
Ten to twelve thousand pounds? I highly doubt it. Perhaps you meant 3 to 4 tons. That would make more sense.
ORIGINAL: itcantbestephen
Suburbans are probably closer to like 5 or 6 tons. I had an '89 lwb Silverado with a 350tbi in it, it could move pretty well for a stock 17 year old (at the time, it got stolen August of '06) truck, lots of torque.
Suburbans are probably closer to like 5 or 6 tons. I had an '89 lwb Silverado with a 350tbi in it, it could move pretty well for a stock 17 year old (at the time, it got stolen August of '06) truck, lots of torque.
I know they are heavy, but not what the guy posted.
#14
RE: ANOTHER WIN FOR THE CAMAROS!
ORIGINAL: 02StanGT
Ten to twelve thousand pounds? I highly doubt it. Perhaps you meant 3 to 4 tons. That would make more sense.
ORIGINAL: itcantbestephen
Suburbans are probably closer to like 5 or 6 tons. I had an '89 lwb Silverado with a 350tbi in it, it could move pretty well for a stock 17 year old (at the time, it got stolen August of '06) truck, lots of torque.
Suburbans are probably closer to like 5 or 6 tons. I had an '89 lwb Silverado with a 350tbi in it, it could move pretty well for a stock 17 year old (at the time, it got stolen August of '06) truck, lots of torque.
#17
RE: ANOTHER WIN FOR THE CAMAROS!
maier is kindaright. the 1/2 ton, 3/4, and 1 ton WAS the rating. Now the names are used just to comply with convention, because those trucks are capable of handling alot more now. The old names havent truely applied in forever, but still, the 150 and 1500 series trucks are half ton by convention, and 250/2500 and 350/3500 are 3/4 and 1 respectively
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post