LT1/LT4 Tech 1993-1997

Hp estimates?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 05-02-2011, 12:28 AM
MaVeN's Avatar
2nd Gear member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 587
Default

Originally Posted by Connor15
I'm making 300 with my v6
Bull****..
 
  #12  
Old 05-02-2011, 12:37 AM
xXChipXx's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 238
Default

Originally Posted by Camaro 69
The h.p. difference between the OBD1 and OBD2 cars is because in 96 the Camaro now had 2 cat converters. That's where the gain came from, the engines are the same. A good rule of thumb is that an automatic car will lose in the neighborhood of 15% h.p. to the wheels. It's not a preset flat number of h.p. lost. Based on the one in the video getting 230 at the wheels puts it right on the money (233 h.p. would have been a dead nuts 15% loss from 275). Their gain to 277 at the wheels equates to having 325 at the crank, a 50 h.p. gain. Not too shabby!
So If a 95 and 96 both had deleted cats, they would be the same?
 
  #13  
Old 05-02-2011, 12:44 AM
MaVeN's Avatar
2nd Gear member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 587
Default

Not sure but I don't think so. The tune is different.
 
  #14  
Old 05-02-2011, 01:04 AM
Camaro 69's Avatar
Senior Moderator
January 2010 ROTM Winner
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The 'Burbs of Chicago
Posts: 18,306
Default

Originally Posted by MaVeN
Not sure but I don't think so. The tune is different.
Might be, can't say with certainty. But it's apples and oranges anyway. Take a pre-96 and a 96, do the same mods to the engine, have the computers tuned the same, and they should both end up being equal (in a perfect world). The engines are the same, the ignition is the same. The original stock h.p. differences come from outside the engine.
 
  #15  
Old 05-02-2011, 01:09 AM
xXChipXx's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 238
Default

Whats the best way to get closer to 350 after the mods I stated?
 
  #16  
Old 05-02-2011, 06:34 AM
timmyz28's Avatar
2nd Gear member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: East Stroudsburg, PA
Posts: 584
Default

Heads and cam are next up. If you do all the mods you listed, heads and cam, and a good tune, you can be at around 400 rwhp.
 
  #17  
Old 05-02-2011, 09:40 AM
lt1 xjs's Avatar
In the Staging Lanes
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 62
Default

Originally Posted by MaVeN
My goal is to get 300 rwhp with on only bolt-ons.
I dynoed 265 rwhp, 305 tq stock but I did have dual exhaust. After the bolt-on's in my sig its at 309 rwhp, 336 tq. A 44 rwhp gain. So,,, An airfoil, cai, ewp, ASP dampner set (pulleys), 1.7 rockers with springs, a tune and shorty headers with x pipe has netted me 44 rwhp. I do have a new BBK 52 twin sitting around maybe I'll try that next.
 
  #18  
Old 05-02-2011, 09:57 AM
cbr600rx7's Avatar
NOOO they be stealin' my bucket
ROTM Winner's Club
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fort Brag NC (no longer in iraq)
Posts: 2,200
Default

Originally Posted by Camaro 69
The h.p. difference between the OBD1 and OBD2 cars is because in 96 the Camaro now had 2 cat converters. That's where the gain came from, the engines are the same. A good rule of thumb is that an automatic car will lose in the neighborhood of 15% h.p. to the wheels. It's not a preset flat number of h.p. lost. Based on the one in the video getting 230 at the wheels puts it right on the money (233 h.p. would have been a dead nuts 15% loss from 275). Their gain to 277 at the wheels equates to having 325 at the crank, a 50 h.p. gain. Not too shabby!
^^
Dead on. A stock LT1 should lay down 230-240 RWHP give or take a few. With good intake, exhaust, and tune you gain 20-30 whp easy. If 300 is your goal then (intake, headers, y-pipe, cam, and tune) will get you there with no problem. The LT1 loves good cams and can pick up good numbers with no problem.
 
  #19  
Old 05-02-2011, 12:42 PM
xXChipXx's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 238
Default

Im leaning towards a tune from lt1pcmtuning because it is cheapers, but is there any reason I should get it from pcmtuningforless?
 
  #20  
Old 05-02-2011, 01:17 PM
SpecterGT260's Avatar
Ninja Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Potato
Posts: 6,172
Default

pcmforless is a well known name...

when it comes to tuning you can really screw your car up if the person responsible for the tune isn't doing their job right.
 


Quick Reply: Hp estimates?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:18 AM.