LT1/LT4 Tech 1993-1997

Hp estimates?

Old May 2, 2011 | 12:28 AM
  #11  
MaVeN's Avatar
2nd Gear member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 587
Default

Originally Posted by Connor15
I'm making 300 with my v6
Bull****..
 
Old May 2, 2011 | 12:37 AM
  #12  
xXChipXx's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 238
From: Wichita, KS
Default

Originally Posted by Camaro 69
The h.p. difference between the OBD1 and OBD2 cars is because in 96 the Camaro now had 2 cat converters. That's where the gain came from, the engines are the same. A good rule of thumb is that an automatic car will lose in the neighborhood of 15% h.p. to the wheels. It's not a preset flat number of h.p. lost. Based on the one in the video getting 230 at the wheels puts it right on the money (233 h.p. would have been a dead nuts 15% loss from 275). Their gain to 277 at the wheels equates to having 325 at the crank, a 50 h.p. gain. Not too shabby!
So If a 95 and 96 both had deleted cats, they would be the same?
 
Old May 2, 2011 | 12:44 AM
  #13  
MaVeN's Avatar
2nd Gear member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 587
Default

Not sure but I don't think so. The tune is different.
 
Old May 2, 2011 | 01:04 AM
  #14  
Camaro 69's Avatar
Senior Moderator
January 2010 ROTM Winner
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 18,306
From: The 'Burbs of Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by MaVeN
Not sure but I don't think so. The tune is different.
Might be, can't say with certainty. But it's apples and oranges anyway. Take a pre-96 and a 96, do the same mods to the engine, have the computers tuned the same, and they should both end up being equal (in a perfect world). The engines are the same, the ignition is the same. The original stock h.p. differences come from outside the engine.
 
Old May 2, 2011 | 01:09 AM
  #15  
xXChipXx's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 238
From: Wichita, KS
Default

Whats the best way to get closer to 350 after the mods I stated?
 
Old May 2, 2011 | 06:34 AM
  #16  
timmyz28's Avatar
2nd Gear member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 584
From: East Stroudsburg, PA
Default

Heads and cam are next up. If you do all the mods you listed, heads and cam, and a good tune, you can be at around 400 rwhp.
 
Old May 2, 2011 | 09:40 AM
  #17  
lt1 xjs's Avatar
In the Staging Lanes
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 62
From:
Default

Originally Posted by MaVeN
My goal is to get 300 rwhp with on only bolt-ons.
I dynoed 265 rwhp, 305 tq stock but I did have dual exhaust. After the bolt-on's in my sig its at 309 rwhp, 336 tq. A 44 rwhp gain. So,,, An airfoil, cai, ewp, ASP dampner set (pulleys), 1.7 rockers with springs, a tune and shorty headers with x pipe has netted me 44 rwhp. I do have a new BBK 52 twin sitting around maybe I'll try that next.
 
Old May 2, 2011 | 09:57 AM
  #18  
cbr600rx7's Avatar
NOOO they be stealin' my bucket
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,200
From: Fort Brag NC (no longer in iraq)
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

Originally Posted by Camaro 69
The h.p. difference between the OBD1 and OBD2 cars is because in 96 the Camaro now had 2 cat converters. That's where the gain came from, the engines are the same. A good rule of thumb is that an automatic car will lose in the neighborhood of 15% h.p. to the wheels. It's not a preset flat number of h.p. lost. Based on the one in the video getting 230 at the wheels puts it right on the money (233 h.p. would have been a dead nuts 15% loss from 275). Their gain to 277 at the wheels equates to having 325 at the crank, a 50 h.p. gain. Not too shabby!
^^
Dead on. A stock LT1 should lay down 230-240 RWHP give or take a few. With good intake, exhaust, and tune you gain 20-30 whp easy. If 300 is your goal then (intake, headers, y-pipe, cam, and tune) will get you there with no problem. The LT1 loves good cams and can pick up good numbers with no problem.
 
Old May 2, 2011 | 12:42 PM
  #19  
xXChipXx's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 238
From: Wichita, KS
Default

Im leaning towards a tune from lt1pcmtuning because it is cheapers, but is there any reason I should get it from pcmtuningforless?
 
Old May 2, 2011 | 01:17 PM
  #20  
SpecterGT260's Avatar
Ninja Administrator
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,172
From: Potato
Default

pcmforless is a well known name...

when it comes to tuning you can really screw your car up if the person responsible for the tune isn't doing their job right.
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:00 AM.