LT1/LT4 Tech 1993-1997

camaro z28 vs mustang gt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 01:44 AM
  #1  
franco-28's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Newbie
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 9
Default camaro z28 vs mustang gt

how much faster is a 2006 mustang gt 4.6lr copaired to a 1997 camaro z28 5.7lr

cause im thinking on buying one but im not sure if there any faster then the camaro i own now

(STOCK)
 
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 02:29 AM
  #2  
Skippysnax's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 144
From:
Default

I have a 96 lt1 camaro with simple bolt ons such as headers intake exhaust...etc. The car has 190000 miles on it!!!! Anyways to the point. I raced a 2007 gt fresh off the lot, still had the temp plates. The guy i raced is by no means a bad driver and it was a manual. We did a 45mph roll and i took him by about a car length! Im sure if we were to go down to the track and race he would probly win a few and i would as well, but the point is they are by no means as fast as ford makes them out to be. Chances are your 97 would eat it alive, plus mustangs have 5 speeds... nuff said!!
 
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 07:37 AM
  #3  
Saint Ebony's Avatar
Third Generation Moderator
March 2010 ROTM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 973
From: Canada
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

A 2008 Mustang GT is slower than an '87 305 IROC-Z, which is quite a bit slower than an LT1 Z28.

Mind you, we're only talking 0 to about 45 or 50, but still.
 
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 09:35 AM
  #4  
murderd96z28's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 168
Default

amen to the z28, my 96, before the dyno tune and haveing the cats removed..... so i had a cat back and a cold air, i raced a N/A cobra, my buddies car and he is a skilled driver, my z had him by almost2 cars at the end of a 1/4 mile, mustangs are "quick" in first gear but the camaro is "fast" in all of em!!!!
 
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 11:00 AM
  #5  
torque_is_good's Avatar
4th Gear Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,614
From: under the hood
Default

I happen to own both vehicles but neither is stock.

When you say faster, do you mean trap speed? or, do you mean 0-60 quicker?

Here comes the flame but I view them as different vehicles. You are talking about 281 vs 350 CID. One is newer, more refined (but the headrests suck) and with body kits, look awesome.

The LT1's are a bear to get to the engine but are a beast in the low end torque.

Seriously, teen and college age girls will say that they like my car when I have the stang. Guys will look at it but that's about it. With the Z, guys come up to it and appreciate it and want to see under the hood. I find the Z to be more comfortable to drive long distances (did I mention the headrests suck on the stang). You have to get the rpm's up on the 281 while the 350 has good low end pull. Again, maybe I'm wrong but I view them as 2 different types of cars. One is more show and fun(with sucky headrests) while the other is more a beast and less show.
 
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 01:10 PM
  #6  
murderd96z28's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 168
Default

i agree
 
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 02:30 PM
  #7  
craby's Avatar
April 2011 ROTM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 22,022
From: Tokeland, Washington
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

if your saying the mustang is a feminine car and camaro is manly then i would agree. lol
 
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 11:44 PM
  #8  
mattj29's Avatar
Newbie
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3
From: alabama
Default

i have a 94 z28 automatic. my buddy has a 2000 mustang gt. i have a k/n air filter chip and quick shift in the tranny. he has a few things done but not much. he drove my car and so did his brother they said my z would stripe the gt. dont get me wrong i like mustangs but i love my z.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
InfernoOrangeSS
2010+ General
14
Jan 26, 2012 01:57 AM
luciora
93-02 General
17
May 12, 2010 09:12 AM
IB Adrian
67-69 General
0
Oct 12, 2009 12:03 PM
RS96LSU
VS
29
Apr 14, 2009 11:20 AM
wally247
VS
24
Nov 25, 2006 06:10 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04 PM.