Is SS and Z28 the same thing?
#31
02-26-2008, 03:27 PM
RE: Is SS and Z28 the same thing?
ORIGINAL: ninetysixyenko
but what you dont understand is, that it DYNO's at what GM rated it at the crank. also, 20HP over a LT1 isnt gonna make a second faster in the 1/4
but what you dont understand is, that it DYNO's at what GM rated it at the crank. also, 20HP over a LT1 isnt gonna make a second faster in the 1/4
Bottom line is this.. GM has a habbit of underrating engines more so than most companies. Most of their performance oriented engines have been underrated from the factory (at least up until the new SAE rules that took effect a coupe years ago) and the LS1 in the f-body cars is one of the most extreme examples. That engine made virtually the same hp (give or take 15) in every car it was put in. Other examples of underrated engines that were put in multiple cars are the LS2, LS6, LT1, and LSJ Ecotec among others, but most of those were rated at the same (but incorrect) hp in the various cars you could get them in.
#32
02-26-2008, 04:16 PM
RE: Is SS and Z28 the same thing?
which is exactly why using the rated HP numbers makes absolutely no sense what so evAr!
#33
02-26-2008, 04:22 PM
RE: Is SS and Z28 the same thing?
ORIGINAL: STIC5
I'm going to pretend I didn't hear that and thereforeavoid restartinganother old debate...
Bottom line is this.. GM has a habbit of underrating engines more so than most companies. Most of their performance oriented engines have been underrated from the factory (at least up until the new SAE rules that took effect a coupe years ago) and the LS1 in the f-body cars is one of the most extreme examples. That engine made virtually the same hp (give or take 15) in every car it was put in. Other examples of underrated engines that were put in multiple cars are the LS2, LS6, LT1, and LSJ Ecotec among others, but most of those were rated at the same (but incorrect) hp in the various cars you could get them in.
ORIGINAL: ninetysixyenko
but what you dont understand is, that it DYNO's at what GM rated it at the crank. also, 20HP over a LT1 isnt gonna make a second faster in the 1/4
but what you dont understand is, that it DYNO's at what GM rated it at the crank. also, 20HP over a LT1 isnt gonna make a second faster in the 1/4
Bottom line is this.. GM has a habbit of underrating engines more so than most companies. Most of their performance oriented engines have been underrated from the factory (at least up until the new SAE rules that took effect a coupe years ago) and the LS1 in the f-body cars is one of the most extreme examples. That engine made virtually the same hp (give or take 15) in every car it was put in. Other examples of underrated engines that were put in multiple cars are the LS2, LS6, LT1, and LSJ Ecotec among others, but most of those were rated at the same (but incorrect) hp in the various cars you could get them in.
#34
02-26-2008, 04:25 PM
RE: Is SS and Z28 the same thing?
its not worth bringing up again..... if he wants to believe his lt1 is a mid 13 second car he can
#35
02-26-2008, 04:34 PM
RE: Is SS and Z28 the same thing?
well i dont get what he ment by that post.[>:]
unless he's talking about the 1second part
unless he's talking about the 1second part
#36
02-26-2008, 05:34 PM
RE: Is SS and Z28 the same thing?
ORIGINAL: ninetysixyenko
well i dont get what he ment by that post.[>:]
unless he's talking about the 1second part
well i dont get what he ment by that post.[>:]
unless he's talking about the 1second part
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
