Camaro Z28 1994-1997 VS Camaro Z28 1998-2002

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 10, 2010 | 11:49 AM
  #1  
sebi1990's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 372
From: Chicago
Default Camaro Z28 1994-1997 VS Camaro Z28 1998-2002

Whats the diffrence between the two Gen 4 camaros I know the looks and the new enging that was put into the camraros after 1998 but why dose eveyone tell me that the 1998 to 2001 are way better then the previous brothers?
 
Old Jul 10, 2010 | 11:52 AM
  #2  
Chaotic94's Avatar
September 2011 ROTM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,402
From: Missouri
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

The engine was the big difference. Front end was different. I'm not sure what else was different. Other than they're newer and usually have fewer miles lol.
 
Old Jul 10, 2010 | 12:44 PM
  #3  
sebi1990's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 372
From: Chicago
Default

Is the RHP output the same in both z28?
 
Old Jul 10, 2010 | 12:49 PM
  #4  
Chaotic94's Avatar
September 2011 ROTM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,402
From: Missouri
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

I think the LS1 made more power. From what I hear, they're easier to mod for boost and whatnot.
 
Old Jul 10, 2010 | 12:53 PM
  #5  
Chaotic94's Avatar
September 2011 ROTM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,402
From: Missouri
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

Here's some info I found...
"Both the LS1 and the LT1 are exceptional engines which make tons of power and have even more potential for making monster power. The LS1 has several key advantages over the LT1 including, All Aluminum Block and Heads vs. the cast iron block and heads of the LT1. Also the LS1 makes 35-40 more horsepower straight from the factory. The LS1 is a souped up version of the LT1. Both motors are strong and capable. It just depends on ur budget and how much money you can spend on an f-body. They are totally different engines. Different materials. Different designs. Different displacements. Different parts. Different family of engines. Totally different. The LT1 is the venerable Chevy 350 c.i. that came out of the 265/283/327 line of engines. The design is fifty years old. The LS1 displaces 346 cubic inches and is the first of a whole series of Chevy engines that were introduced around 1997 in the Covrette. Head gaskets may wear out faster on an LT1 because of the expansion rate difference between iron and alum when they get hot"
 
Old Jul 10, 2010 | 01:07 PM
  #6  
Gorn's Avatar
Fourth Generation Moderator
October 2009 ROTM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 10,560
From: Eastern PA,
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

If you do a search here and on the LT1 form and the LS1 form you will find dozens of threads with very detailed info on the advanages of either motor. The are several situation where an LT1 is a better motor but that all depends on what you want to do with it and what is your budget.
 
Old Jul 10, 2010 | 01:50 PM
  #7  
Camaro 69's Avatar
Senior Moderator
January 2010 ROTM Winner
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 18,306
From: The 'Burbs of Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by Chaotic94
...The LT1 is the venerable Chevy 350 c.i. that came out of the 265/283/327 line of engines. The design is fifty years old...
Is this misinformation from Wikipedia by chance? They're calling the LT1 a 50 year old design. That's in reference to the old LT-1 from 1970-72, used in the Vette and Z/28.
The "new" LT1 (notice no dash) is a totally different engine from the old Gen 1 engines (265/283/327 line).
 
Old Jul 10, 2010 | 02:56 PM
  #8  
Chaotic94's Avatar
September 2011 ROTM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,402
From: Missouri
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

Originally Posted by Camaro 69
Is this misinformation from Wikipedia by chance? They're calling the LT1 a 50 year old design. That's in reference to the old LT-1 from 1970-72, used in the Vette and Z/28.
The "new" LT1 (notice no dash) is a totally different engine from the old Gen 1 engines (265/283/327 line).
I quoted that from another forum website.
 
Old Jul 10, 2010 | 03:56 PM
  #9  
craby's Avatar
April 2011 ROTM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 22,015
From: Tokeland, Washington
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

i think the motor is one of the least important changes. the ignition system is the big thing that makes me think the ls a better setup. looks are the big plus with the lt for me.
 
Old Jul 10, 2010 | 03:58 PM
  #10  
Chaotic94's Avatar
September 2011 ROTM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,402
From: Missouri
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

Originally Posted by craby
i think the motor is one of the least important changes. the ignition system is the big thing that makes me think the ls a better setup. looks are the big plus with the lt for me.
Agreed. I prefer the older 4th gens too. If only We could get the older body with the newer engine lol
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 PM.