Brakes vs Chassis?

Old Apr 27, 2011 | 01:13 PM
  #11  
craby's Avatar
April 2011 ROTM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 22,016
From: Tokeland, Washington
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

im very happy with my koni's. the most noticable thing ive put on besides the shocks is the subframe connectors. should get my sway bars soon.
 
Old Apr 27, 2011 | 02:00 PM
  #12  
je$$up97's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 145
From: Bradenton
Default

crabby, which koni's did you get. I'm thinking about the 4/4's
 
Old Apr 27, 2011 | 02:32 PM
  #13  
craby's Avatar
April 2011 ROTM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 22,016
From: Tokeland, Washington
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

thats what i got. they didnt have the other ones out when i got mine.
 
Old Apr 28, 2011 | 12:03 AM
  #14  
libertyforall1776's Avatar
Overdrive Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,042
From: IL
Default

4/4s are on-car adjustable -- what I got. Don't waste money on DAs unless you have or plan an aftermarket rear-end... SAs are adequate for stock rear-ends.
 
Old Apr 28, 2011 | 12:08 AM
  #15  
libertyforall1776's Avatar
Overdrive Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,042
From: IL
Talking

Cool, I'm glad you got some good inputs -- Strano is a book of handling/suspension knowledge -- a little gruff, but pretty unbiased on products and brands for what REALLY works...

If you're set on his lowering springs, go for it, but do them at the same time as your shocks (esp. the fronts), else you're doing almost the same job twice. Sways can go on regardless, you'll just have to disconnect front end-links when doing the shocks/springs later.

Strano usually recommends a full-length adjustable torque arm, like UMIs -- is that what he told you?

Originally Posted by je$$up97
I spent a few minutes on the phone with Sam and he supported everything you just wrote. I wanted to try his springs, but he's backordered like two months. He pretty much convinced to spend the money on the Koni's and sways, which will be a big help. He said the torque arm and SFC are good upgrades, but the money would be better spent on a set of Kick-A$$ shocks. I'm gonna order a set of Koni's...once I get them installed I'll post up some picks and feedback.
 
Old Apr 28, 2011 | 12:12 AM
  #16  
libertyforall1776's Avatar
Overdrive Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,042
From: IL
Post

Out of curiosity, did you put the Konis on first or the SFCs? If Koni's first, did you notice much of a difference with the SFCs? Are they welded?

Consensus seems to be you will notice the welded SFCs more on the stocker shocks, but Konis or Bilsteins tend to hide some of the effect...

I had the SFCs welded first, and still have yet to get my front Konis on -- soon, gotta order new shock mounts first.

Originally Posted by craby
im very happy with my koni's. the most noticable thing ive put on besides the shocks is the subframe connectors. should get my sway bars soon.
 
Old Apr 28, 2011 | 12:24 AM
  #17  
craby's Avatar
April 2011 ROTM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 22,016
From: Tokeland, Washington
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

got the shocks first and yes noticed quite a difference almost as much as when i changed the shocks. im not sure the sway bars are gona do much.
 
Old Apr 28, 2011 | 12:41 AM
  #18  
libertyforall1776's Avatar
Overdrive Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,042
From: IL
Default

Cool. You will be in for a treat from what others have said that the 35/22 hollow sways really made the completion, and a big difference.

Actually the real completion is supposed to be a watts link in the rear to replace the panhard and stabilizer bar, which I am seriously considering -- not cheap though.

Originally Posted by craby
got the shocks first and yes noticed quite a difference almost as much as when i changed the shocks. im not sure the sway bars are gona do much.
 

Last edited by libertyforall1776; Apr 28, 2011 at 05:06 PM.
Old Apr 28, 2011 | 03:23 PM
  #19  
Schuy69's Avatar
In the Staging Lanes
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 57
From: Rochert, MN
Default

Don't forget, that upgrading your suspension and handling also help the performance of the brakes. The less weight that shifts to the front wheels when you slam on the brakes, the less abuse they have to take on their own
 
Old Apr 28, 2011 | 03:34 PM
  #20  
je$$up97's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 145
From: Bradenton
Default

As per my conversation with Sam, here really stressed the point to have good shocks. He said the money spent here would be more beneficial that SFC and UMI torque arm. He said he doesn't even run SFC on his car, because good shocks will relieve more of the strain. Although, he said they never hurt.

He also said the torque arm is good if you are getting excessive wheel hop, which is more related to straight line accelaration. I'm going to start doing a little auto-crossing...if I was drag racing the torque-arm would be more beneficial.

I really appreciate his straight forwardness, I'm gonna spend the money I have set aside to buy really good shocks, rather than mediocre shocks and the SFc and torque arm.
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 PM.