1992 5.0 mustang, track times
#21
RE: 1992 5.0 mustang, track times
dows you have a cai and upgraded exaughst right so what your talking about is trading a much better car with 5 more horse for a car with 5k less miles and 5 less horse.....hate to tell you bud but youd be losing a small chunck of pwer and a big chunck of respect
#23
RE: 1992 5.0 mustang, track times
Well that one doesn't look too bad...
The stang will be faster, more hp, more tq, lighter car....
What I was getting at it's not that big of an upgrade power wise...I'd go with which car you think looks better...
btw, the Camaro will handle better i think
EDIT: According to my 1/4 site...the 1993 GT runs a 16.1...that may be wrong, I dont see why it wouldn't be faster than our 3.8's
The stang will be faster, more hp, more tq, lighter car....
What I was getting at it's not that big of an upgrade power wise...I'd go with which car you think looks better...
btw, the Camaro will handle better i think
EDIT: According to my 1/4 site...the 1993 GT runs a 16.1...that may be wrong, I dont see why it wouldn't be faster than our 3.8's
#29
RE: 1992 5.0 mustang, track times
a bone stock 5.0 car is a dog....i have seen them get their *** handed to them by 3.1V6 5spd Cavaliers. the advantage to the Fox body is upgrades...the 5.0 Fox body is endlessly upgradeable and easy to make a fast car..but stock they were dogs