Frostlime, I totally agree with you. I admire a person or persons that have been able to keep a car that long, stock, and in good condition. But, there's just not that many CF members that have a stock or original camaro and therefore we would not be catering to the masses here by having that catagory for ROTM. There will be way more chances for everyone to get into ROTM coming soon.

 

If you did an all original class, you'd have to allow in all generations with all original cars, including the 5th gen members. I don't think that would be a very good competition. Just nothing special about it to me.

 

yeah, i have a lot of respect for people who have all stock, original, unmolested classic cars. but at the same time look at people like myself and orocker and mogvet, who have put in countless hours of work and dollars to turn our cars into something that is uniquely ours, because there wont be another EXACTLY the same. so why not let them compete in the same catagory? i think they are both equaly impressive. and so once again i believe that each of these cars(no bull****)are ROTM material. and besides the result of this poll is just peoples personal opinion anyways...we each know what we have.

 

brian_rs/ss

 

hhmmm. original class and a dynacorn class. big difference. lets include "restomod" camaros and "ratrods" together in the same catagory if were all ok with $100K restomod 1st gen camaros competing with an all original 67' six banger. Gorn's ride is a nice 1st gen camaro. most of the comments i get from my car is if its original. its always followed up with "keep it that way". its too bad the past has been "left behind" in this ROTM.

 

some of us have spent thousands of $$$ restoring a 69 Z28 or a 67 pace car. X22 "barn finds" restored back to original is something that can "not" be done done from a summit catalog.

 

^very VERY true sir. and dually noted.

 

^ that means he noted it twice

 

is that doubly noted lol

 

quite possibly...which ever you chose to call it, i have done it.