LT1/LT4 Tech 1993-1997

LT1 poor performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-18-2017, 08:57 AM
makin69's Avatar
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 2
Default LT1 poor performance

Just seeing if anyone has a theory on this engine.A customer brought in a 57 chevy nomad refitted with a iron headed lt1.It ran fine he just wanted a little more power.I added 1.6 roller rockers and full length headers,nothing crazy just a little old school hot rodding.Touching it off it sounds great,road testing wow it pings so bad you really cant get on it,and mid throttle roll ons it feels like it now has barely enough power to pull itself???Ive done similiar mods on camaros and corvettes all benefitted but this is new and unpleasant.Any ideas?
 
  #2  
Old 05-18-2017, 09:16 AM
Lakerman62's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Gresham Oregon
Posts: 147
Default

sometimes a tune is in order with long tube headers and/or is there an adjustment needed for any knock sensors? best wishes
 
  #3  
Old 05-18-2017, 12:08 PM
Gorn's Avatar
Fourth Generation Moderator
October 2009 ROTM
ROTM Winner's Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Eastern PA,
Posts: 10,351
Default

Rockers are a little to tight? How does the vacuum look at idle? Pinging indicates lean and that the knock sensor is not working. You should have codes if it pinging? Maybe you bumped something or did something to restrict the fuel flow?

Maybe you are very unlucky and something happened to fail while you are working on it? How was the conversion done? is it a factory OBD1 or 2 system? How old is the opti?
Is the MAF connected? If the MAF connector is original it will be VERY delicate. Any damage to that connect would cause the symptom you described.
 
  #4  
Old 05-18-2017, 02:56 PM
craby's Avatar
April 2011 ROTM
ROTM Winner's Club
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Tokeland, Washington
Posts: 21,637
Default

it does sound like lifters may be a little over tightened. did you go with 1 or with 1/2 turn. also did you change the pushrods, if it didnt have rollers befor it will need different length for roller lifters, maybe get some better springs on her.
 
  #5  
Old 05-18-2017, 08:17 PM
makin69's Avatar
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 2
Default

Thanks for the suggestions.I kept the stock pushrods,which has always worked in the past.The rockers were zeroed and 1/2 turned.I did have to put a 90 degree elbow on one knock sensor for proper clearance of the headers.They make headers for 57 chevys and headers for lt1s,but apparently not 57 chevys with rack and pinion steering and a lt1 lol.I should add i swapped out the springs for ones suggested for 1.6 rollers.I would not doubt it needs a different tune,the one in it is obviously custom and by a company i can not locate, go figure.
 
  #6  
Old 05-18-2017, 09:15 PM
craby's Avatar
April 2011 ROTM
ROTM Winner's Club
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Tokeland, Washington
Posts: 21,637
Default

you using a 93 ecm, dyno is always best, solomon would be a good mail order tuner. if you had the plugwires off better double check, one off or not on correct or the right ones crossed can do this. dont ask how i know
 
  #7  
Old 05-19-2017, 06:56 AM
Gorn's Avatar
Fourth Generation Moderator
October 2009 ROTM
ROTM Winner's Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Eastern PA,
Posts: 10,351
Default

Is this a GM system, Painless? Holley? Megasquirt? or one of 20 others out there. Can't really help if we have no idea what we are working with.

Try unplugging the MAF sensor and see if the car runs better. Try unplugging the Knock sensor. There really needs to be a way to get codes out of the car or at least see data in the computer. It just a matter of time before something goes wrong. If it was my customer that what I would tell him. "I might have bumped a wire but this needs figured out for when something goes wrong".

As you have described your upgrades they are minor, you should have no trouble with a stock tune. You would not get the full benefit of the upgrades but the car would certainty be drive able because the O2 sensors would be able adjust your fuel mixture as need. Your headers do have both O2's in the collectors? It may take a little while for the block learn to get use to new O2 locations but that would not be as bad an issue as you described. I am talking slight shake at idle and maybe a sputter on acceleration the kind most people would not notice. I have not done Lt1's but I did a lot of L98 TPI cars back in the day. If is almost the same fuel injection system. Even with a CAM upgrade I never had one run as bad as you described on a stock tune.

You could back off the valves a little just until you hear a slight tap and see if the car runs better. Based on your first description if sound like a car starving for fuel.
I have no idea your back ground but when a GM computer sees WOT (Wide Open Throttle) it is considered a safety issue and it no longer has the emission issues. It will dump extra fuel. Some racers will take advantage of this with a small dry NOS hit at WOT. If you have spark knock at WOT with known good fuel somehow you are swinging for 11;1 fuel ratio to an 18+:1 fuel ratio. That is dramatic, and well beyond what a stock O2 sensor can adjust.
 

Last edited by Gorn; 05-19-2017 at 07:28 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NightRider
93-02 V6 Tech
6
12-07-2010 08:06 PM
jcurrin
LT1/LT4 Tech
11
12-09-2006 02:18 PM
t4nk
93-02 V6 Tech
6
11-04-2006 12:10 AM
IROCZJON
82-92 General
3
10-23-2006 02:58 AM
The_Shadow
82-92 General
7
10-20-2005 06:44 PM



Quick Reply: LT1 poor performance



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34 PM.