LS Series Tech 1998-2002

Dyno numbers :(

Old Dec 18, 2009 | 11:37 AM
  #1  
LeadFarmer's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
In the Staging Lanes
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 33
From: Arlington,Tx
Default Dyno numbers :(

just dyno'd my car yesterday on a dynojet for the first time and needless to say i was quite disappointed. first run(276hp/280tq) 2nd(293/293) 3rd.took out my air filter, left lid open(302,302) my mods are as follows (borla catback no muffler, slp y pipe, mti lid) i have properly maintained the car, chained oil every 3k miles, seafoamed car when i got it 3 months ago, changed plugs after seafoam, checked fluids, have used engine decarb several times. never abused it. i'm the second owner and it has been sitting in a garage for 4yrs. 107k miles.

during my first run there was a lot of black smoke in the higher rpm band, and alot of fuel being dumped from exhaust, each run after it got better.

I really feel like this was a complete fail run, is this normal? or is something wrong?
my friend wit a 01 cobra came wit me and we have done the same exact mods on our cars(X pipe instead of Y) and mileage is about the same he pulled (293/293)
 
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 11:58 AM
  #2  
z28pete's Avatar
Tech Droid
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,215
From: North East PA
Default

You used a chassis dyno which displays power at the tires. Due to losses in the power train, power at the tires is usually 15% to 25% less than at the crankshaft. Also, the Dynojet machine is less optimistic than the Mustang machine, and is going to give somewhat lower results.
 
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 12:10 PM
  #3  
LeadFarmer's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
In the Staging Lanes
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 33
From: Arlington,Tx
Default

so are these numbers normal for a ls1 w/ these mods and no ls6 intake?
 
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 03:24 PM
  #4  
Zoilus's Avatar
April 2009 ROTM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 441
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

Originally Posted by LeadFarmer
so are these numbers normal for a ls1 w/ these mods and no ls6 intake?
I agree..they seem a bit lower but as mentioned before, you are getting Rear Wheel horse ratings and that dyno is a bit conservative but even if the numbers are off , it wont be by much. your car is an A4 and even that eats up a bit more HP. Im taking a shot in the dark but has the car been professionally tuned after the mods?? That may help squeeze out some more.. but honestly with those mods and a tune you should be a bit more.

Most LS1's even A4's regardless of year do around 290 or so stock and up to around 310 if its an 01 or 02 and manual. and without a tune your mods may give you around 15rwhp or so. Again all those numbers are general, but it does seem you are a bit on the low end. try to find a mustang dyno and if you havent already...get a tune ...then try again!

Good luck
 
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 03:46 PM
  #5  
camaro_burns_all's Avatar
VIP member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 820
From: Lost somewhere in the Galaxy
Default

A4 LS1 Stock will dyno at 290 - 300 RWHP

something is wrong with that dyno numbers. Yours should be higher
 
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 05:34 PM
  #6  
LeadFarmer's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
In the Staging Lanes
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 33
From: Arlington,Tx
Default

i'm gonna get a tune and see if that helps much, and yes i agree it def. does seem low, i've just sorta ran out of ideas as to what it could be, i think i'm gonna try some fuel additives to help raise compression cuz i think that's where i may be lacking, suggestions?
 
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 09:16 PM
  #7  
z28pete's Avatar
Tech Droid
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,215
From: North East PA
Default

Fuel additives will not change compression.
 
Old Dec 19, 2009 | 01:13 AM
  #8  
LeadFarmer's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
In the Staging Lanes
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 33
From: Arlington,Tx
Default

what about this stuff
http://www.barsproducts.com/4444.htm
is stuff like this just a scam?
 
Old Dec 19, 2009 | 01:47 AM
  #9  
JYangS14's Avatar
Newbie
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1
Default

Originally Posted by z28pete
You used a chassis dyno which displays power at the tires. Due to losses in the power train, power at the tires is usually 15% to 25% less than at the crankshaft. Also, the Dynojet machine is less optimistic than the Mustang machine, and is going to give somewhat lower results.
Wait, are you suggesting that Dynojets gives a lower hp reading compared to Mustang dynos. I've always seen lower readings on Mustang dynos compared to dynojets.
 
Old Dec 19, 2009 | 03:03 AM
  #10  
adam86107's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 129
From: Texas
Default

Where did you take your car to get it on a dyno? I want to get mine on a dyno before I do any mods to it so i can see how much of a difference I get.
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:43 AM.