General Tech Good at troubleshooting? Have a non specific issue? Discuss general tech topics here.

ls1, or lt1, boost or spray??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 25, 2016 | 07:05 PM
  #1  
meandmyz's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Newbie
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 2
Default ls1, or lt1, boost or spray??

hello everyone, new here and figured I would ask the ppl that drive these cars what would be a better choice....long story First car when I was 15 was a 82 firebird, that my dad and I did a 305 5 speed swap to, then two years later I upgrade too a 85 iroc z(383 powerglide car)....well I got rid of the car when my oldest was born 11 yrs ago and now want another car and since the 70-74 cuda are out of my price range my second fav car is these f bodies.....so my question is what would be a easier build....stock bottem end ls1 help it breather better and a 125-150 wet kit, or rear mounted turbo....or with similar mods....just worried about stock lt1 bottom end.....but should I be??lt1 cars are way cheaper then ls1 cars....either way I want about 500 hp in this car as end goal.....thanks for you help....cant wait to be driving an f body again
 
Old Jul 25, 2016 | 07:59 PM
  #2  
craby's Avatar
April 2011 ROTM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 22,001
From: Tokeland, Washington
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

no contest, ls1 can get to 500 without juice or boost, 400 easy. 400 is not so easy with a lt1. lt1 sound better though. lol
 
Old Jul 30, 2016 | 01:02 PM
  #3  
95 camaro 406's Avatar
4th Gear Member
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,315
From: troy NH
Default

boost cost more but not as hard on the engine as nitro can be ,I like super charger myself
 
Old Aug 7, 2016 | 11:28 AM
  #4  
Gorn's Avatar
Fourth Generation Moderator
October 2009 ROTM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 10,560
From: Eastern PA,
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

Back when the was a 10k difference between a Lt1 and a LS1 you could argue that the LT1 could be built equal to the Ls1 for less. Now that the price of the cars are within 2-3K of each other there is no much to talk about.

Unless you are buying a LT1 that has already been upgraded to all forged bottom end they are not worth messing with. They are quickly going the route of the 3.4. Good ones are hard to find and becoming more rare every years. The nice part about the LS1 and the 3800 is GM continued building those platforms for a long time after the Camaro was discontinued. Meaning if you blow a LS1 you can pull a engine from a 2007 Escalade and have a nice upgrade. Same thing with the 3800 you can get a motor out of a 2007 Grand Prix. With the Lt1 you either rebuild or you find a 20+ year old engine.

As Craby said you can do cam and heads on a Ls1 and hit 500 HP. People think NO2 is much cheaper then turbo but do not fall into that cheap kits they sell. There is a huge difference between building a NO2 system that works and building a NO2 system that will NOT hurt your engine any more then a turbo. Keep in mind a turbo system can damage you engine also. A stuck waste gate will blow a part your engine as fast as a weak fuel pump will on a NO2 system. Unless you are building a dedicated racer I would try to stick with NA.
 

Last edited by Gorn; Aug 7, 2016 at 11:40 AM.
Old Aug 8, 2016 | 10:08 PM
  #5  
arocars's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 122
From: Norton, Massachusetts
Default

An LS engine and an aftermarket supercharger will get you to 500 hp and still be driveable. Likely to be easier (more people have done it), and cheaper (more parts out there for it).
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
drive334
93-02 General
5
Apr 30, 2012 11:50 PM
frostlime69
67-69 General
10
Nov 30, 2007 02:41 PM
nj02z28ls1
Detailing
21
Aug 3, 2007 07:09 PM
350rs
82-92 General
5
Feb 20, 2007 03:21 AM
Z28insc
LS Series Tech
4
Jan 2, 2007 08:09 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:06 AM.