seriously? that is brand new information...the point is...mustangs use superchargers cause they haven't figured out how to make horsepower NA.

don't get me wrong though, i'd love to have a saleen...i think they just look sexy

 

now what about mopar? my neighbors charger is pretty quick

 

why are you bringing up mopar? the original statement was mustangs...last time i checked, chrysler has nothing to do with a mustang

 

you sure?........ok, what about the....jeeze, fords suck all of fords supercars are supercharged.....then what does that make the zr1? its also s/c

 

ok, just to screw iwinulose's argument.

417rwhp NA.

zoilus has 460+na

and my car has functional spray, just never been on the rollers w/ it. what will i get with a 125 shot? will we take iwinulose from the leader spot?

 

btw, there is a thread for this in the general tech section. but only post if you have slips for it. we need to populate that list

 

My Camaro? about 523 RWHP NA and 760ish with full NOS: it seems to measure a bit different with every pull on NOS. Too many mods to list all: cast iron 408 12:1, AFR big port heads, roller rockers, Kochs headers, QTP electric dumps, cold ran air hood, FAst manifold, 90mm throttle -- the usual stuff. And a lot of NOS.

My Lincoln? About 227 FWHP -- better than I expected. Stock as a stone, but running premiu fuel.

My Aston has a optional ProDrive aluminum-lithium block engine that measured 441 HP on an engine dyno when built , before going into the car. Now, with just under 2200 miles on it , it puts down 380 RWHP at 7700 RPM, and is and shall remain bone stock: but it's not bad for 4.3 liters.

Oh, and my tired old '65 Tiger with a 260 cubic inch Ford V8, originally rated at 175 HP or something, puts down 103 RWHP. Still fun.

 

lee, u suck. gimme ur 408 please

 

GM owners unite. We're beatin' down dem dern Ferds!

 

A sunbeam Tiger?