93-02 V6 Tech V6 Camaro General Topics.

Car Runs Rough!! Help!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 5, 2012 | 11:09 PM
  #21  
Camaro 69's Avatar
Senior Moderator
January 2010 ROTM Winner
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 18,306
From: The 'Burbs of Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by 740cordaws
Ok, so here's the deal. I just replaced the fuel pump in my 1999 camaro 3.8L. I picked it up from the mechanic and could automatically tell it wasn't running "right." I drove it home (about 20 miles) shut it off and went inside for a while. When I came back out to start it, it simply wouldn't start.....
And you didn't immediately turn right around and go back to the mechanic to have him fix it correctly why? Is it correct to say that the engine wasn't running this way before the fuel pump was replaced (back when the old one was working)?
When you unplug the MAF sensor, it puts the system into open loop mode, running off the computers presets instead of all the sensors. I suspect it may be a faulty sensor, other than the MAF, giving a bad reading when in closed loop mode. From what you describe, it sounds like the engine isn't acting up when it's a cold start?
 
Old Feb 6, 2012 | 07:27 AM
  #22  
740cordaws's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Newbie
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 14
Default

Basically, I'm tight on money after dropping nearly $800 for the fuel pump and labor, so I figured I'd leave pricey mechanics out of this equation. Are there any ways (other than checking voltage) to check if the MAP, o2s, IAC are faulty? You're right Camaro69, it starts up perfectly fine on a cold start.
 
Old Feb 6, 2012 | 08:57 AM
  #23  
Camaro 69's Avatar
Senior Moderator
January 2010 ROTM Winner
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 18,306
From: The 'Burbs of Chicago
Default

I think you missed my point about the mechanic. If the engine was running fine when the other fuel pump was still working, and now it's not with the new pump, the car shouldn't have left the mechanics place with it running bad like that. Maybe he bumped, knocked, or broke a sensor or wire when he was under the hood checking your fuel pressure. Never know.
Let's start with what most likely is not the problem:
MAF sensor - you replaced with no difference
MAF circuit - unplugging the MAF makes a difference = connection
When in open loop (your cold engine, or when you disconnected the MAF) the computer makes the engine run with a richer air/fuel mix than when it's in closed loop and running off all the sensors.
So it sounds as though your engine is running lean when it goes into closed loop mode.
You're getting a random misfire code. Here's a list of possible causes of a random misfire: non-working or clogged fuel injector(s), bad spark plugs or wires, bad coil pack, bad/restricted catalytic converter, bad oxygen sensor(s), stuck or clogged EGR valve, faulty camshaft position sensor, burned exhaust valve, defective computer.
Now a couple of those things (cat, EGR) can get pretty much ruled out, as they would make the engine run bad with or without the MAF plugged in. And I would expect a cylinder specific (not random) code if things like the coil or cam pos. sensor was bad.
My first "guess" would be to check the fuel injectors, either not firing or not flowing well. Then the spark plugs and wires. Those last two are a possibility, even with the changing MAF, since a plug can have an easier time firing with more fuel than less (your open loop rich condition). Oops.....this response got a little long!!
 

Last edited by Camaro 69; Feb 6, 2012 at 09:02 AM.
Old Feb 6, 2012 | 09:06 AM
  #24  
740cordaws's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Newbie
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 14
Default

Thanks! I'll get on that today. I appreciate the responses
 
Old Feb 6, 2012 | 03:59 PM
  #25  
z28pete's Avatar
Tech Droid
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,215
From: North East PA
Default

Fuel injected cars run in two modes: open loop and closed loop. when an engine is cold or the trouble lamp is lit, it operates in open loop and most sensors are ignored. When the engine is warm and the trouble lamp is off, the engine operates in closed loop and all sensor inputs are observed. By you unplugging the MAF, you forced the engine to work in open loop and follow a preset program. The fact that the engine worked better with the MAF unplugged indicates that one or more sensors are bad, but not necessarily the MAF. You need a scanner to look for trouble codes, if no codes are set or retained, you need to use the scanner to look at the output of each sensor and see if it makes sense for the conditions at that point.
 
Old Feb 6, 2012 | 07:22 PM
  #26  
740cordaws's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Newbie
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 14
Default

Turned out that both MAF sensors I used, (the old one) and (the new one) were both faulty. I obtained another new MAF sensor and plugged it in. My car runs like new! THanks everyone for the helpful info.
 
Old Feb 6, 2012 | 08:20 PM
  #27  
Camaro 69's Avatar
Senior Moderator
January 2010 ROTM Winner
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 18,306
From: The 'Burbs of Chicago
Default

Sheesh! Was the new one "new", or used but new to your car? If new, I'd avoid that brand again.
 

Last edited by Camaro 69; Feb 6, 2012 at 08:22 PM.
Old Feb 6, 2012 | 11:04 PM
  #28  
740cordaws's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Newbie
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 14
Default

It was brand new. Autozone had it and it was the cheapest one at just under $134...needless to say I got my money back from that one and put an extra bit of cash in for the more expensive one.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
drewsredcamaro
93-02 General
3
Feb 12, 2012 12:59 PM
vinnyfirstblood
93-02 General
5
Nov 8, 2011 11:18 AM
tdg
82-92 V8 Tech
0
Oct 19, 2009 02:17 PM
magnum041
93-02 V6 Tech
7
Aug 27, 2008 12:17 PM
JRs72RS
Computer & Fuel Systems
0
Aug 21, 2008 09:05 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 PM.