93-02 V6 Tech V6 Camaro General Topics.

Bad lifter, full head swap?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 10:25 AM
  #11  
shawnz_90's Avatar
In the Staging Lanes
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 33
From: Kenosha, Wi
Default

Im just going to do a swap... but personaly i think its a dumb design... Why make a v6 that has an over rated 160hp and 19mpg when the V8s have 275 hp@ 5000 RPM (under rated) and roughly the same mpg only diffrence is 30cents a gallon.
 
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 06:28 PM
  #12  
evilkal's Avatar
4th Gear Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,633
From: Kentucky
Default

Your 160 hp isn't overrated... And the 275 of the LT1 definitely isn't underrated... Where you get your facts? Your 3.4 should be getting good mileage but it's probably all the crap knowledge you seem to have acquired that is blocking your reasoning...
 
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 07:47 PM
  #13  
shawnz_90's Avatar
In the Staging Lanes
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 33
From: Kenosha, Wi
Default

ok heres just a few sights

http://www.theautochannel.com/vehicl...ws/wk9421.html (on the bottom)

EPA Economy - miles per gallon,
city/highway/observed 19/28/23.7
0 to 60 mph 9.8 sec
1/4 mi (E.T.) 16.9 sec
Coefficient of drag (cd) .33 - with top up


http://www.mpgfacts.com/?did=73&year=1995
EPA Official City MPG: 19

bottom line it dont get great for a six and its not that fast...
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BudBrown
LT1/LT4 Tech
49
Mar 29, 2012 04:25 PM
franksaltz28
LS Series Tech
2
Jun 21, 2008 12:46 PM
slovik89
82-92 V6 Tech
1
May 17, 2007 04:57 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:03 AM.