__ My Camaro is only getting 10 mpg city. Causes?

Old Dec 25, 2011 | 08:34 AM
  #11  
craby's Avatar
April 2011 ROTM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 22,007
From: Tokeland, Washington
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

better have a look to see if your egr has been removed. if your egr is open all the time that would screw the mpg
 
Old Dec 26, 2011 | 02:27 PM
  #12  
roscioli21's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 14
From: Conshohocken, PA
Default

Originally Posted by craby
better have a look to see if your egr has been removed. if your egr is open all the time that would screw the mpg
thanks! ill definitely look into that. im taking it to the shop tomorrow
 
Old Dec 26, 2011 | 03:21 PM
  #13  
iLL95's Avatar
I Like to Party
Super Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,112
From: South TX
Default

Originally Posted by 94CamaroV6
I'm having similar issues. I have a stock '94 V6 3.4L, and I get ~11-13 city and ~14 Highway. I get ~170 miles to the tank. I'm having codes thrown at me with my scanner. it returns the SES light with 3 codes, "EGR Valve 1" "EGR Valve 2" "EGR Valve 3", 75 76 77 codes, and it happens during deceleration from above 50MPH. If anyone could help, thanks.
Start a new thread in this forum section please
 
Old Dec 26, 2011 | 06:59 PM
  #14  
Catmaigne's Avatar
2nd Gear member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 499
From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Default

Originally Posted by Gorn
Doing the required routine maintenance is not throwing parts at it. Spending hours trying to figure out whats wrong with a car just to find out it needs the routine maintenance is very wastful. With this complaint and no light step one should be make sure all normal maintenance is up to date.
Not necessarily... If possible, I'd check the functionality of any part before replacing it with some data logging and other experimentation. There's no use in replacing a healthy sensor or part.
 
Old Dec 26, 2011 | 08:03 PM
  #15  
Gorn's Avatar
Fourth Generation Moderator
October 2009 ROTM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 10,560
From: Eastern PA,
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

Originally Posted by Catmaigne
Not necessarily... If possible, I'd check the functionality of any part before replacing it with some data logging and other experimentation. There's no use in replacing a healthy sensor or part.
I am talking about parts that are suppost to be replaced based on life cycle. Imagine how pissed you would be if you had a miss, the mechanic spent 2 hours checking everything ($170) just to tell you "you need to spend $18 fuel filter" If the car is not up to date with the required mainteance that should be done first. Now if he knows everything is up to date I agree.
 
Old Dec 26, 2011 | 08:03 PM
  #16  
craby's Avatar
April 2011 ROTM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 22,007
From: Tokeland, Washington
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

if fouled or aging 02 sensors can show a proper reading that is false. that can cause the motor to run rich but show its lean on a datalog.
 
Old Dec 26, 2011 | 08:21 PM
  #17  
Catmaigne's Avatar
2nd Gear member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 499
From: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Default

I'm not saying that you should avoid regular maintenance on your car... I just think you should do a bit of digging before you go spending uncontrollably on parts that may not be the root of your problem. You should do a bit of problem solving first.

And Craby, when it comes to O2 sensors the best thing to do would be to check the datalog, check the sensor visually for fouling, and then a voltage test using a propane torch + multimeter to gauge the health of the zirconia element. O2s are expensive, there's no point in buying new parts if the old ones are in perfect working order.
 
Old Dec 27, 2011 | 04:10 AM
  #18  
craby's Avatar
April 2011 ROTM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 22,007
From: Tokeland, Washington
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

yes that test "almost" always works.
 
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 04:48 PM
  #19  
Grandpaswagon's Avatar
2nd Gear member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 711
From: Goldendale, WA
Default

I didn't intend to start an argument on doing normal maintenance. I was hoping to get him thinking that not all codes will set an SES light.

Going to the auto parts store and pulling codes is free for the most part. If there is a code stored, then he would have an idea of where a potential problem would be.

For my money, modern cars (I classify all 4th gens as modern) would not show a 50% reduction in mileage just on "tune up" parts, without there being some other symptoms (back firing, weak acceleration, hard starting, etc). Since the only thing the OP mentioned was the sucky mileage, my first inclination would be to pull any codes.

The only thing pulling codes costs is time and it could easily save a lot of money on unnecessary parts, especially since he has an OBDII car. Of course, eventually the "tune up" parts will require replacement, but if they are not the cause of his mileage problem, I fail to see the reason to just replace them.
 
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 11:54 AM
  #20  
auto's Avatar
3rd Gear Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 826
Default

+1 on what gorn is saying, when i was getting 7mpg city until i changed the coolant temp sensor which bumped me instantly to 12.5, almost all the parts that i`ve taken off the car has been original so far, so maintenance is key
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 AM.