82-92 V8 Tech V8 Camaro General Topics.

Turbocharger question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 11:21 PM
  #1  
tme1129's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Newbie
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1
From: United States
Default Turbocharger question



I have a 1994 Z28 Camaro, and i am wondering if an LT1 turbo kit will fit on the LS1 motor or not. also, what is better, a turbo or a supercharger. thanks!</P>


</P>
 
Old Apr 29, 2004 | 02:59 AM
  #2  
lemansblue68's Avatar
Newbie
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10
From: United States
Default Turbocharger question

no it will not fit, the middle two exhaust ports on the lt1 are siamesed where as the exhaust ports on an ls1 are seperated like a big block, if you did some fabrication it could fit though. everybody has their own opinion on which is better, but a turbo is more efficient since it uses a minimal amount of engine power to spool where a supercharger is drivne off the crank and isn't as efficient.
 
Old May 24, 2004 | 01:51 AM
  #3  
Z-28drivertexas's Avatar
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4
From: United States
Default Turbocharger question



<FONT size=2>if u have a 94 Z28, you have an lt-1, so the lt1 turbo WOULD fit</FONT></P>
 
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 08:36 PM
  #4  
94z28's Avatar
Newbie
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2
From: United States
Default Turbocharger question



dude i have heard bout the twin turbo kit for the LT1 but can never find it if any one knows where to get it and how much please tell me thanks</P>


</P>
 
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 09:50 PM
  #5  
EASYcompany7's Avatar
Newbie
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7
Default RE: Turbocharger question

turbo'in an eight can be a pain sometimes but you can machine your own parts to rig it sometimes. But answering your supercharger or turbocharger question. Turbo's only spool up at high rpms. They also create alot of heat. Superchargers are cramming air down your motors throat 24/7 though but they cost alot more and arent for the casual drivers.
 
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 02:25 AM
  #6  
diliii's Avatar
Newbie
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3
Default RE: Turbocharger question

i have a turbo system on my 67 camaro. i also have a 144 blower on my sandrail. the turbo is going by by. and going back to the blower. no lag with a blower. its a proven fact for me since i have experience both. the power loss is minimal compared to the power output. think you will really enjoy a supercharger, good luck, rob
 
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 12:37 PM
  #7  
JD1969's Avatar
4th Gear Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,687
Default RE: Turbocharger question

Lag can be caused by not sizing the turbo correctly, and the superchager if it is a centrifical like a Vortec is basicly a belt drivin turbo. PSI for PSI a turbo motor will make more power and will do it alittle safer. To answer the original question, the kit will work but you need to get some new parts such as headers, brackets, injectors, you will need to change some of the piping, in the end it might be better if you just sold the LT1 kit and bought the correct one for your application.
 
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 11:09 PM
  #8  
HURSTLT1's Avatar
In the Staging Lanes
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 41
From:
Default RE: Turbocharger question

i come from the import scene, i've had 4 turbo'd cars....turbos are constant maintenance, true there is more room for improvement but unless you like dirt under your nails go with an s/c set-up. i've only had my lt1 for a month now and i can't see turboing it. an s/c will do all i need it do. the lt1 block is pretty much indestructible so an s/c under a normal amount of boost won't do any more damage. and how us importers would overcome spool up was to add a lil 25-50 shot of nos when racing. that way you can have a t6 on a 2.0 and still have power before 7-8grand. but anyway it's just my opnion...if you want a daily driver, go with an s/c if want a weekend racer strap on a turbo and have real fun....
 
Old Dec 7, 2005 | 03:36 AM
  #9  
Lee Willis's Avatar
2nd Gear member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 572
From:
Default RE: Turbocharger question

I much prefer the supercharger. Lower maintenance, more low end torque (although centrigfugal superchargers aren't as good there as the screw types) and simpler installation.

I also LOVE the fact that you can run a supercharger while using good long-tube headers on the car, rather than have to use the turbo manifolds. I can tell the difference in the sound, and low end responsiveness and torque are better.
 
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 11:57 PM
  #10  
z28pete's Avatar
Tech Droid
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,215
From: North East PA
Default RE: Turbocharger question

I have owned several factory turbocharged cars, 2 Audis and a Turbo GP. From what I have seen, the factories, espaecially Audi, went to all sorts of gyrations to make these engines as reliable as a normal engine. This included an oil filter and oil cooler just for the turbo, a separate fan to blow air over the injectors to keep them cool because of the additional under hood heat caused by the turbo, a separate electric water pump to cool the turbo bearings, and an after run cooling set up which turned the turbo water pump and cooling fans on after the engine was shut down in order to keep the turbo bearings from cooking the lube oil. I really don't see too many tuners going to all this work to keep the turbo reliable. So the other solution is a lot of maintance, whic can be a real pain in the ****. Personally I prefer a screw type supecharger, such as the Whipple. These are very efficient, more than a centrifugal unit, provide boost from idle to red line, requre a lot less plumbing than a turbo, or even a centrifugal, and don't heat up the air as much as a roots or centrifugal unit.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Connor15
93-02 General
28
Apr 17, 2011 10:40 PM
ry92grandprixse
General Tech
1
Dec 29, 2007 03:43 PM
Fawkin_newb
93-02 V6 Tech
2
Feb 20, 2005 11:56 PM
imwithstupid
93-02 V6 Tech
0
Apr 10, 2004 02:29 AM
LO3Jeff
82-92 V8 Tech
1
Dec 13, 2003 05:00 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:11 PM.