2.5 Iron Duke rocks.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-22-2010, 11:15 AM
Gorn's Avatar
Fourth Generation Moderator
October 2009 ROTM
ROTM Winner's Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Eastern PA,
Posts: 10,354
Default 2.5 Iron Duke rocks.

If you have a sail boat and you want it to stay in one place just hook a chain to one of these bad boy and thow it over the side and your good to go. Try that with a SBC. They are just too hvy!
 
  #2  
Old 03-26-2010, 05:35 PM
1990CamaroRS's Avatar
Fancy Sparkle
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,119
Default

lol Gorn, you just had to say that didn't you.


really, the Iron Duke is a good engine for getting gas mileage and nothing else.
 
  #3  
Old 03-26-2010, 06:02 PM
Saint Ebony's Avatar
Third Generation Moderator
March 2010 ROTM
ROTM Winner's Club
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 973
Default

Originally Posted by 1990CamaroRS
really, the Iron Duke is a good engine for getting gas mileage and nothing else.
No it's not. :/ A friend of mine drives a Grand Am with one of those, and he does brag about his 27 mpg, at least until I remind him that my Camaro, which has twice as much engine, gets just 3 mpg less, and my Cobalt gets 10 mpg more, and has 45 more horsepower.
 

Last edited by Saint Ebony; 03-26-2010 at 06:04 PM.
  #4  
Old 03-26-2010, 06:13 PM
Camaro 69's Avatar
Senior Moderator
January 2010 ROTM Winner
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The 'Burbs of Chicago
Posts: 18,306
Default

The Iron Duke made for a pretty good boat engine. We used to have a 23' deck boat and could pull 2 adult skiers. But our next one was a 19' with a Ford 302. It went a tad bit better!
 
  #5  
Old 03-26-2010, 07:20 PM
Gorn's Avatar
Fourth Generation Moderator
October 2009 ROTM
ROTM Winner's Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Eastern PA,
Posts: 10,354
Default

Iron Duke was a 4 cyclinder designed in the early 70's. GM was still putting it in cars in 1990. The motor has its place but should have never been in a Camaro.
 
  #6  
Old 03-26-2010, 07:58 PM
1990CamaroRS's Avatar
Fancy Sparkle
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,119
Default

Originally Posted by Saint Ebony
No it's not. :/ A friend of mine drives a Grand Am with one of those, and he does brag about his 27 mpg, at least until I remind him that my Camaro, which has twice as much engine, gets just 3 mpg less, and my Cobalt gets 10 mpg more, and has 45 more horsepower.
are you sure it's the Duke???
 
  #7  
Old 03-26-2010, 08:48 PM
Saint Ebony's Avatar
Third Generation Moderator
March 2010 ROTM
ROTM Winner's Club
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 973
Default

Originally Posted by 1990CamaroRS
are you sure it's the Duke???
Yep. It's a 1990 Pontiac Grand Am LE coupe. 2.5L Tech IV, 110 hp, 125 torque. 3-speed automatic, and ~270,000 miles on the car.

This's it~
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...bony/002-1.jpg
 

Last edited by Saint Ebony; 03-26-2010 at 08:52 PM.
  #8  
Old 03-27-2010, 08:01 AM
Gorn's Avatar
Fourth Generation Moderator
October 2009 ROTM
ROTM Winner's Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Eastern PA,
Posts: 10,354
Default

It was around 89 they added a rev spinning counter weight to reduce vibration that made the motor a little smother, they also put the oil filter in the oil pan to help with dry starting. With the exception of the bad years ,84-86 cracking blocks, the 2.5 was a work horse. In a world where a 2.8 V6 was 130 HP the 95 HP the 2.5 output was not that bad. It did a ok job in S10's when backed with a manual trans. It was a good engine back in the 70's. I had a friend who had on in a 76 Monza I think and it took a beating.
Pontiac really got the shaft with this one. They decided on the 2.5 for their Feiro cause of it torque and reliablity. At the chevy dealership was started seeing cracked blocks in S10 and FWD cars at a rate of maybe 1 in 20. The less then perfect cooling system in the Feiro pushed their engine failure rate to about 1 in 3. Some unlucky owners where on their 3rd motor before they left warranty. Its my opinion that this bad timing that killed the Feiro and made it one of GMs great money losing cars todate.
 
  #9  
Old 03-27-2010, 08:37 AM
Y2K's Avatar
Y2K
Y2K is offline
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Yacolt,WA
Posts: 1,868
Default

Originally Posted by Gorn
Iron Duke was a 4 cyclinder designed in the early 70's. GM was still putting it in cars in 1990. The motor has its place but should have never been in a Camaro.
The factory picked up and used the name "Iron Duke" for the Pontiac engine (although it was really a Chevy based engine) but the name had been used years earlier by hot rodders referring to the iron four that came out in the 1962 Chevy II (shoebox Nova).
The 153cid four was basically just a 230 six with 2 cylinders chopped off.









 
  #10  
Old 03-27-2010, 08:53 AM
1990CamaroRS's Avatar
Fancy Sparkle
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,119
Default

i wonder how well it would take to boost???



















 


Quick Reply: 2.5 Iron Duke rocks.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:38 PM.