exhaust

Old Oct 14, 2009 | 09:08 PM
  #1  
91ralllysport's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
In the Staging Lanes
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 64
Default exhaust

my camaro is mostly stock except for an engine swap its now a 350 i took the muffler of of it but kept the stock manifolds cat and pipe on. i like how it sounds but will it hurt the engine?
 
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 09:17 PM
  #2  
machine1999z28's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 230
From: Belton S.C.
Default

I done the same thing to my 3rd gen only I had resonated tips. I put over 50k on it with no problems
 
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 12:54 AM
  #3  
spamuel's Avatar
Newbie
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 22
Default

With stock manifolds you should have enough back pressure
 
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 01:20 PM
  #4  
91ralllysport's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
In the Staging Lanes
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 64
Default

are the manifolds that restrictive?
 
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 01:43 PM
  #5  
microkid's Avatar
March 2011 ROTM
ROTM Winner's Club
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,615
From: Biglerville, PA
Technical User
Default

its not that the manifolds are that restrictive (although they dont promote high velocity), everything combined though will provide enough back pressure to keep the engine running strong on the bottom end of the rpm range. a stock motor can run an open y-pipe for as many miles as you want to listen to it, its not going to hurt anything other than your ears and low end power.
 
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 02:09 PM
  #6  
Camaro 69's Avatar
Senior Moderator
January 2010 ROTM Winner
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 18,306
From: The 'Burbs of Chicago
Default

Oh no, not the "engine needs back-pressure" myth again! If back-pressure is so good to have, then jam a potato up your tailpipe.
Back-pressure in the exhaust is bad to have for getting "performance" out of an engine, plain and simple. How many dragsters have you seen with cat converters and full length exhaust systems? Exactly!!!
Where that "back-pressure is good" myth came about is from some guys having their valves burn after installing headers and a free-flowing exhaust. "Gee, that better flowing exhaust ruined my engine, I guess I didn't have enough back-pressure".
More modern computer controlled engines react differently and can self-compensate to a certain extent for a more open exhaust. So let's take an old school, carbureted engine like mine for example. In stock form from the factory, everything is balanced out between the carburetor flow, intake, and exhaust system. Now take off that restrictive exhaust and put on headers, free flowing mufflers, and bigger pipes. And you might as well put an open air filament on the carburetor as well. What happens is now your engine is able to cram more air through it since it can breathe a lot easier. But a carb can't compensate for the added air flow because it has jets that are set at a certain size. If nothing is done to increase the fuel flow with the air flow (larger carb, larger jets) you have a lean running engine. And lean running engines tend to burn valves.....and the "too-little back-pressure is bad" myth is born.
 
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 04:33 PM
  #7  
mighty mike's Avatar
2nd Gear member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 319
From: PERRIS, CA
Default

very well put^^^^^^
x2
 
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 11:32 PM
  #8  
Jr. Mechanic's Avatar
August 2009 ROTM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,143
From: Lima, OH and Ft. Lauderdale, FL
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

Originally Posted by Camaro 69
Oh no, not the "engine needs back-pressure" myth again! If back-pressure is so good to have, then jam a potato up your tailpipe.
Back-pressure in the exhaust is bad to have for getting "performance" out of an engine, plain and simple. How many dragsters have you seen with cat converters and full length exhaust systems? Exactly!!!
Where that "back-pressure is good" myth came about is from some guys having their valves burn after installing headers and a free-flowing exhaust. "Gee, that better flowing exhaust ruined my engine, I guess I didn't have enough back-pressure".
More modern computer controlled engines react differently and can self-compensate to a certain extent for a more open exhaust. So let's take an old school, carbureted engine like mine for example. In stock form from the factory, everything is balanced out between the carburetor flow, intake, and exhaust system. Now take off that restrictive exhaust and put on headers, free flowing mufflers, and bigger pipes. And you might as well put an open air filament on the carburetor as well. What happens is now your engine is able to cram more air through it since it can breathe a lot easier. But a carb can't compensate for the added air flow because it has jets that are set at a certain size. If nothing is done to increase the fuel flow with the air flow (larger carb, larger jets) you have a lean running engine. And lean running engines tend to burn valves.....and the "too-little back-pressure is bad" myth is born.
Thank you very much, I didn't have to preach this time, LOL!

You should hear the R-Tards on Jeep Forum, if you say back pressure is a myth, it will be followed with 10 pages of flaming...
 
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 11:40 PM
  #9  
tdg's Avatar
tdg
Newbie
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5
From: NC
Default

I ran headers and two straight pipes by the driveshaft and cut it off before the rearend. Over time it melted my drive shaft seal. I noticed the leak before it got bad but make sure your not to close to anything that might melt.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
scottlt194
LT1/LT4 Tech
7
May 14, 2009 08:27 PM
famlyguy18
93-02 V6 Tech
5
May 6, 2009 05:26 PM
dbess23
93-02 General
5
Sep 17, 2007 02:02 AM
javione
Intake, Headers, and Exhaust
4
Feb 16, 2007 02:27 AM
jhop16
Intake, Headers, and Exhaust
2
Jan 9, 2007 11:21 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 PM.