Gen II Weight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 3, 2012 | 12:51 PM
  #1  
refderek's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 11
Default Gen II Weight

What is/are the main difference(s) that the Gen 2 weighs like 600 or 700 pounds more than the Gen I Camaros?
 
Old Dec 3, 2012 | 11:36 PM
  #2  
reidski182's Avatar
In the Staging Lanes
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 41
Default

Curious myself. Hope there's some unnecessary metal. 600 pounds is a lot.
 
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 07:22 AM
  #3  
refderek's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 11
Default

I did some some extensive research and found the following:

The bumpers both front and rear including the bumper supports to meet the Federal Safety guidelines. Check out those leaf springs that connect the back bumper - very heavy.

The Catalytic Converter

The doors - each door has like an additional 40 pounds of weight with the safety beams inside and the inner part is almost entirely sheet metal.

There are many other additions in weight, but these three seems to estimate out at several hundred pounds alone!!
 
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 10:02 AM
  #4  
1971BB427's Avatar
Second Generation Moderator
Feb 2010 ROTM winner
Jan 2013 ROTM winner
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 9,097
From: Portland, Or
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

Originally Posted by refderek
I did some some extensive research and found the following:

The bumpers both front and rear including the bumper supports to meet the Federal Safety guidelines. Check out those leaf springs that connect the back bumper - very heavy.

The Catalytic Converter

The doors - each door has like an additional 40 pounds of weight with the safety beams inside and the inner part is almost entirely sheet metal.

There are many other additions in weight, but these three seems to estimate out at several hundred pounds alone!!
I assume most people are talking post 73 Camaros, as the earlier Camaros were not that much heavier. The '69 weighed 3135 lbs. curb weight with SBC, and a 1970 was 200 lbs. more equipped the same. The '70 was two inches longer and 3" longer than the '69, and the '69 was the biggest of the 1st gens.
The main difference for the 200 lb. increase on the early 2nd gen, vs. the '69 was size. They're just a wider, longer car. Later increases were federally mandated 5 mph bumpers, and then other smog equipment. The early 2nd gens were 188" long, while the later 2nd gens were 197.6" long. The extra 10" wasn't lighter stuff, it was all very heavy!
 

Last edited by 1971BB427; Dec 4, 2012 at 10:04 AM.
Old Dec 5, 2012 | 04:35 AM
  #5  
77nomad's Avatar
Overdrive Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,848
From: off the grid
Default

As opposed to my 80 coming in a well over 3500# with a SBC and AC.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
blue87iroc350
82-92 General
6
Jan 11, 2010 08:49 PM
GoofieJ21
2010+ General
0
Feb 19, 2009 03:15 PM
cambonesian
82-92 V8 Tech
0
Oct 26, 2007 07:10 PM
My01Z28
LS Series Tech
2
Oct 25, 2007 04:08 PM
RatedZ
82-92 General
0
Dec 10, 2005 03:15 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:40 PM.