New Guy Here---Looking for Muncie Trans Info
#1
New Guy Here---Looking for Muncie Trans Info
Hi everyone. Happy to be on board here! I recently purchased my dream car, a 1969 Camaro. The car has a Muncie 4-speed. Everything (relatively) seems to be in great shape with the car. However, the gearbox of the trans is borderline annoying. First and third gear are so ungodly close together---sometimes I can't tell if I am starting in first or third and it takes the fun out of driving the car! I have never driven in a manual vehicle before where I was so unsure of what gear I was in.
What can I do to fix this issue? Do I need a whole new gearbox assembly? What can I replace without replacing too much? Not sure what may be different about the gearbox on my trans vs. any other Munice 4-speed out there, but I can't imagine that they are all like this.
Any suggestions/advice? Thanks!
What can I do to fix this issue? Do I need a whole new gearbox assembly? What can I replace without replacing too much? Not sure what may be different about the gearbox on my trans vs. any other Munice 4-speed out there, but I can't imagine that they are all like this.
Any suggestions/advice? Thanks!
#2
It's not your transmission, it's the shifter. What kind do you have? If you want to make finding the gears foolproof, look into the Hurst V-gate shifter. Hold the lever up with your first two fingers when shifting into gears 1 & 2, release lever when shifting into gears 3 & 4. Shifting is done in a straight line, not an H-pattern.
#3
It's not your transmission, it's the shifter. What kind do you have? If you want to make finding the gears foolproof, look into the Hurst V-gate shifter. Hold the lever up with your first two fingers when shifting into gears 1 & 2, release lever when shifting into gears 3 & 4. Shifting is done in a straight line, not an H-pattern.
I may consider the V-shifter. I'll be honest in that I probably prefer to row the gears old school though. I really don't mind the H pattern---I've just never done it on a pattern that was this tightly-spaced before.
#4
Picture of the present would be good.
Muncie shifters have a finger grab under the **** to pull up allowing the shifter to be pulled left and up for reverse.
Hurst shifters have a hard spring tension to push against for reverse selection.
And no, there is not much room between 1st & 3rd, by Hurst design.
Designed for fast shifting with open palm from 2nd to 3rd and shifter takes care of the gate purposes - you pull/push to next gear.
Muncie shifters have a finger grab under the **** to pull up allowing the shifter to be pulled left and up for reverse.
Hurst shifters have a hard spring tension to push against for reverse selection.
And no, there is not much room between 1st & 3rd, by Hurst design.
Designed for fast shifting with open palm from 2nd to 3rd and shifter takes care of the gate purposes - you pull/push to next gear.
#5
I had a couple of cars with Hurst shifters, my '64 Corvette had the close ratio Muncie with 2:20 1st gear. It takes a bit of getting used to, the linkage was designed for speed shifting at the track. Give it a chance to grow on you LOL. You can always revert back to stock linkage, just make sure it's in good shape.
Mike
Mike
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
beyondthepale
New Members Area
4
07-01-2010 02:22 AM