2007 Camaro specs
1st Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 187
From: near Richmond, VA
RE: 2007 Camaro specs
ORIGINAL: ninetysixyenko
in the 80s, wasnt Iroc-Z28 the top dawg? Just a Z28 with apperance and suspension mods? i agree with keeping SS top dawg tho, cuz, thats just what 90% of people know it as, and the vette's new top dawg will be a SS, then the cobalt, silverado, etc etc.
there's an article that sais there's gonna be TWO 6ers, and ONE deffenant v8, that being said.. i think we're looking at a 3.9, and maybe either like a 4.3 or even a S/C'ed 3.9 as the other. for the V8s... LS2 is a 6.0 aint it? and if the top of the line v8(excluding that possible S/C'ed v8) is a LS2, why wouldnt they use a 5.7-LS1, not a 5.3-LS4, for the lowest v8 model(although, some said in another post, LS1s arent made anymore.. dont make sense to me, as to why they wouldnt) then the LS3, is the engine they want to use in the S/C'ed version of vette and camaro(which is a 6.2 right?)... all to confusing haha......
as much as i love GM.. they're kinda messed up...
LS1 - 5.7
LS2 - 6.0
LS3 - 6.2
LS4 - 5.3(back downthe litres hmm.)
LS5 - is there one??
LS6 - back down to a HO 5.7...
LS7 - 7.0 AKA the king[8D]
woulda atleast thought they woulda went in order of litres/cubic inches. lol
in the 80s, wasnt Iroc-Z28 the top dawg? Just a Z28 with apperance and suspension mods? i agree with keeping SS top dawg tho, cuz, thats just what 90% of people know it as, and the vette's new top dawg will be a SS, then the cobalt, silverado, etc etc.
there's an article that sais there's gonna be TWO 6ers, and ONE deffenant v8, that being said.. i think we're looking at a 3.9, and maybe either like a 4.3 or even a S/C'ed 3.9 as the other. for the V8s... LS2 is a 6.0 aint it? and if the top of the line v8(excluding that possible S/C'ed v8) is a LS2, why wouldnt they use a 5.7-LS1, not a 5.3-LS4, for the lowest v8 model(although, some said in another post, LS1s arent made anymore.. dont make sense to me, as to why they wouldnt) then the LS3, is the engine they want to use in the S/C'ed version of vette and camaro(which is a 6.2 right?)... all to confusing haha......
as much as i love GM.. they're kinda messed up...
LS1 - 5.7
LS2 - 6.0
LS3 - 6.2
LS4 - 5.3(back downthe litres hmm.)
LS5 - is there one??
LS6 - back down to a HO 5.7...
LS7 - 7.0 AKA the king[8D]
woulda atleast thought they woulda went in order of litres/cubic inches. lol
Clyde
4th Gear Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,103
From:
RE: 2007 Camaro specs
jus think it's wierd to have a ls4 go in the lower model V8, if thats what they plan.. mite be a strong engine. but jus seems wierd stepping down in CI/litre. specially, when the LS4 is rated for less horse and torque, than the LS1 and LS2.
don't know. just seems wierd to not have a 5.7, and to have LS2 die, after such a short life[X(]
whatever they decide tho, it'll always beat ricers and fords!![8D]
don't know. just seems wierd to not have a 5.7, and to have LS2 die, after such a short life[X(]
whatever they decide tho, it'll always beat ricers and fords!![8D]
1st Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 187
From: near Richmond, VA
RE: 2007 Camaro specs
ORIGINAL: riceeater
the vette ss exists check the thread in this section about it, pete posted it yesterday
the vette ss exists check the thread in this section about it, pete posted it yesterday
Clyde
2nd Gear member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 666
From:
RE: 2007 Camaro specs
I thought you meant the car does not exist, yeah the name does not but a name does not really matter. If camaro had a diff name we would still like it. at this point people should call the vette a supercharged factory vette, the other names dont really matter
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
