wow your dumb i have a budy with a stock 89 5.0 mustang and i have a 98 v6 camaro and i beat him by 3 cars on a back road,and the funny thing is that he can beat the new GT mustangs so really you have no idea what your saying

 

and my 73 can kick my v6's *** all over the place so once again your stupid and your in the wrong forum go back to MF.

 

no offense Musicman. My budys dad has a 98 1500 5.3 with a chip and dual exhuast and i have yet to see a honda beat it. not to mention it will roast 35inch tires.

 

lol. so what if it can roast 35s? my friends HEMI has 42 baja claws on it and it'll smoke all 4 of them.

 

hes obviously a troll who doesnt really know cars.dont engage him.

 

Probably a member of some other car forum that got his butt handed to him by a Camaro [8D]

 

Or trying to start a second viper page .

For the eco tech able to support 800 horses on its stock crank i have no idea wear you are pulling the numbers from but you a little bit off. The cylinder sleeves fail ataround 700 horses. Most people start upgrading theinsidesaround the 300 mark.

 

The toyota you keep talking about is called a AE86 and no the one in the pic is not one. They did offer the 16 valve 4ag over here but dont buy the hipe. If you are a real car guy and can love a simple car that was way a head of its time and respect that its a good fun car. If you cant then you will find a miata just as fun as the 86. In japan there was a 20 valve 4age and there was also a turbo version not sold in the states. Keep in mind we are dealing with a 1.6L that only makes around 130 horses.

 

LS1> 2.0 SC
LS1> 2.0 Turbo
Any questions

 

A RSX type S with a gready turbo system and supporting mods would only lay down around 250-280 horses depending on mods and boost. Jackson SC would run around 230-250 range. There are also gearing and traction isue's that would come into play. Since the RSX type S is loaded with extra's a F-body is only about 100-200 pounds over the S.