VS Cars going head to head!

LT1vs. 96 cobra

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 08-12-2005 | 06:45 PM
nj02z28ls1's Avatar
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 25
From:
Default RE: LT1vs. 96 cobra

it takes more hp to turn a auto than a man trans
 
  #22  
Old 08-17-2005 | 10:41 PM
wantals1camaro's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4
Default RE: LT1vs. 96 cobra

u should dust them the 96 gt was pretty much the slowest year ever made and there aren't that much of a difference between a gt and cobra and believe me i have a mustang. and as u can tell by my screen name what i really want lol
 
  #23  
Old 08-20-2005 | 12:13 AM
aaronsirocz's Avatar
In the Staging Lanes
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 97
From:
Default RE: LT1vs. 96 cobra

well except for the new cobra and gt there is about a 130 hp difference between the two now
 
  #24  
Old 08-20-2005 | 04:04 PM
wantals1camaro's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4
Default RE: LT1vs. 96 cobra

yea but the o3-04 cobra are supercharged 96 cobra are completely out of that range even with the PI swap because of the eaton/ or sometimes kb superchargers
 
  #25  
Old 08-24-2005 | 12:57 AM
nj02z28ls1's Avatar
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 25
From:
Default RE: LT1vs. 96 cobra

the one statement about the slowest stang, sorry it was the 1993 cars before the body change, ford put a smaller cam in the cars to make the epa standards for that year so they did not have to pay any fines to the epa on the new stadards for 1993. i bought one in november of 92 and it was a piece of ****. i traded a 1990 coupe body with the gt-40 iron heads and intake. ford had them rated at 205 hp let me tell ya i do not think it was close. i traded it 14 months later and only put 3500 miles on it. (shame on you ford)
 
  #26  
Old 08-24-2005 | 01:51 AM
JD1969's Avatar
4th Gear Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,687
Default RE: LT1vs. 96 cobra

The Cobra being the exception, the 96,97 and 98 4.6 cars were the worst of the GT's. Go on any Stang board and ask.
 
  #27  
Old 08-27-2005 | 05:59 AM
93stanglx's Avatar
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5
From:
Default RE: LT1vs. 96 cobra

The cobra should take him if i understand the camaro is 285 stock and the cobra is 305 stock,Plus the cobra is a manuel and you are an automatic, Auto shifts quicker but manuel could redline and go through gears higher...


It would be a good race though....


And The cobra engine and the GT engine are different engines who ever asked that
 
  #28  
Old 10-03-2005 | 12:05 PM
ponypleasure5.0's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2
Default RE: LT1vs. 96 cobra

ok well the cobra is rather quick with its 305 hp and 300 ft lbs of tq itdoes 0 to 60 in 5.9 second and a top speed of 152mph
o yeah i almost forgot its a ford
 
  #29  
Old 10-03-2005 | 07:46 PM
85Camarodude's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 114
From: NC
Default RE: LT1vs. 96 cobra

im not sure about the regular cobras but the 96 mystic cobra runs a 1/4 in 14 seconds according to this website http://fast-autos.net/ford/fordmysticcobra.html

thats the special edition one so im guessing the regular cobra would be worse or the same

correct me if im wrong
 
  #30  
Old 10-03-2005 | 08:38 PM
85Camarodude's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 114
From: NC
Default RE: LT1vs. 96 cobra

http://www.stangbangers.com/GT_vs_Ca...8_Article2.htm

the 94 camaro z28 ran 14.1 seconds in a 1/4 mile

it all depends really on the source but for the most part the cobras are runnin 14 seconds and the camaro z28 is runnin 14 seconds to 14.1 seconds

very close times, as far as im concerned its a tie

the 94 z28 vs the 94 gt on the other hand is no competition, the z28 blows it away hands down according to car and driver
 


Quick Reply: LT1vs. 96 cobra



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:20 AM.