so ur one of those dumbass ppl that sits inside on the computer all day jerkin his d*** off to animae **** so u dont even hav a girl for me to impregnate hah?

 

and he can just be banned again... and again... and again.

 

guess he forgot we had the corvette 11 and a half years before the mustang. so with out the camaro, GM would still have the upper hand

 

remember poison he has the time on his hands to just make more email addresses to continue getting banned

 

Yup, I do have time. Just don't think I'll be back here. I don't want to.

And for the record, I love the Corvette and it's timeless history. The Vette is not and was not designed to compete with Mustangs; nor was the Mustang built to compete with it.

 

that would be hard for the vette to compete with something that wasnt in production. you dont think that the corvette had anything to do with the mustang being built?

 

This is very true. I agree with spec. We may hate each other but that hate has made two great cars in history. Both the Ford and GM have had there good and bad days. But the swearing needs to stop on both sides. Please keep the forums clean. Other then that i would have to say all is fair.

 

Can anyone say Cadillac Cimmaron or Lincoln Blackwood.

 

like the 74-78 mustang....those are just bad.

 

Not directly, no. The Mustang was introduced to the public in a college campus in 1964 because it was targeted at young people and was meant to be affordable. The pricier Vette was always aimed at a different social and economic group of people. I'm sure Ford wanted to get in on the sports car market, but not at the same plateau that the Vette was and IS.

The Camaro came out 2-3 years after the Mustang looking like it; priced the same, etc. Not to say GM was the only one. In the late 60's, Dodge/Plymouth introduced a bunch of affordable muscle cars, too. All geared at each other; not the Vette.