Back-seat Stingray

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #151  
Old 06-06-2013, 10:33 AM
Camaro 69's Avatar
Senior Moderator
January 2010 ROTM Winner
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The 'Burbs of Chicago
Posts: 18,306
Default

Spring rate doesn't have anything to do with changing ride height. New springs might change it some though, if yours are worn and compressed. A higher spring rate will give you better handling (less dive in the turns), but will also give you a harsher ride. These cars ride like a truck in stock form, so consider what you want to get out of it. If you are replacing the rear leaf spring, definitely get a fiberglass one. There is no debate there.
 
  #152  
Old 06-06-2013, 12:39 PM
bobarian91's Avatar
BackseatBob
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: El Paso
Posts: 561
Default

I know spring rate doesn't mean ride height but those were my only options for springs that didn't lower it. Pretty much same options for 1" lowering springs too...
I've heard it the other way as far as the rear spring. That if I wanted one that was gonna last to stick with steel. Because composite springs won't lose spring, but they WILL break if a rock hits them wrong. Plus going to something so much lighter screws up the balance even more since you're taking weight off the rear end where it's already unbalanced
 
  #153  
Old 06-06-2013, 01:14 PM
bobarian91's Avatar
BackseatBob
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: El Paso
Posts: 561
Default

Actually... what's your opinion on coil-overs?
 
  #154  
Old 06-06-2013, 02:31 PM
Camaro 69's Avatar
Senior Moderator
January 2010 ROTM Winner
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The 'Burbs of Chicago
Posts: 18,306
Default

Originally Posted by bobarian91
I've heard it the other way as far as the rear spring. That if I wanted one that was gonna last to stick with steel. Because composite springs won't lose spring, but they WILL break if a rock hits them wrong. Plus going to something so much lighter screws up the balance even more since you're taking weight off the rear end where it's already unbalanced
lol....nope. Give yourself some peace of mind and get under a C4 Vette and tell me what kind of springs they have, front AND rear. Ok, I'll make it easy and tell you, composite springs! And I wouldn't worry about the slight less weight, the only thing I noticed on mine is a better ride, which is what composite gives you over the clunky steel springs.
I never messed with coil-overs, so can't give you any first hand guidance there.
 
  #155  
Old 06-06-2013, 04:07 PM
bobarian91's Avatar
BackseatBob
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: El Paso
Posts: 561
Default

Huh. I didn't realize that the composite springs had advanced that much by the C4 body... good to know! Thanks man
 
  #156  
Old 06-06-2013, 08:21 PM
Camaro 69's Avatar
Senior Moderator
January 2010 ROTM Winner
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The 'Burbs of Chicago
Posts: 18,306
Default

Starting with the C4, so waaaay back in 1984, both front and rear springs are composite. The front springs are a single transverse mount type, just like the back is. No coils.
 
  #157  
Old 06-07-2013, 12:59 AM
bobarian91's Avatar
BackseatBob
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: El Paso
Posts: 561
Default

Safe to assume there's no way to convert the front to that in the 69? Meh on second thought that sounds like more trouble than it's worth Haha. Anyway so does 430lb rate sound like a good compromise? I don't plan on racing this thing, just cruising and showing it off. Maybe put a ricer in it's place once in a blue moon.
 
  #158  
Old 06-07-2013, 01:00 AM
bobarian91's Avatar
BackseatBob
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: El Paso
Posts: 561
Default

Talking about front of course... rear I'll use a 330lb composite spring.
 
  #159  
Old 06-07-2013, 12:46 PM
Camaro 69's Avatar
Senior Moderator
January 2010 ROTM Winner
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The 'Burbs of Chicago
Posts: 18,306
Default

Originally Posted by bobarian91
Safe to assume there's no way to convert the front to that in the 69? Meh on second thought that sounds like more trouble than it's worth Haha.
A bolt on kit has been around for a number of years. Not exactly dirt cheap though, but if you're already looking at replacing some of the front suspension stuff.... http://www.vbandp.com/auto-parts.htm...category_id=47
 
  #160  
Old 06-07-2013, 01:47 PM
bobarian91's Avatar
BackseatBob
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: El Paso
Posts: 561
Default

I'm thinkin I'll stick with stock type suspension in the front for now at least
 


Quick Reply: Back-seat Stingray



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32 AM.