LT1/LT4 Tech 1993-1997

LT1 compression ratio question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-12-2006, 01:50 AM
sewerrat's Avatar
2nd Gear member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 467
Default LT1 compression ratio question

How did GM manage to raise the LT1s compression ratio up to 10.25 and not have a detonation problem even with using lower octane gas? Did they sacrifice timing curves? I'm wonder about this because I'd like to rebuild my 1980 K10 350 engine which has somewhat a low compression up to about 9.5 to 1 and still be able to use low octane fuel. Thanks for any input

Mike
 
  #2  
Old 08-12-2006, 11:54 AM
SickSickSick's Avatar
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Orange, Texas
Posts: 925
Default RE: LT1 compression ratio question

by decreasing the size of the combustion chamber. deck the block and mill the heads. sick
 
  #3  
Old 08-12-2006, 01:05 PM
z28pete's Avatar
Tech Droid
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North East PA
Posts: 9,215
Default RE: LT1 compression ratio question

The LT1 uses reverse cooling. This sends cooled water to the heads first and then to the block. This keeps the heads cooler than normal and allws higher compression without detonation. Also the heads have fast burn combustion chambers, which also control detonation better. The engine will perform best on premium fuel, but is capable of running on lower octane gas because of the knock sensor, which retard spark timing when detonation occurs. However, this makes the engine sluggish, especially if regular fuel is used.

If you build your engine using Vortec heads, which are similiar to LT1 heads, but without the reverse cooling feature, 9.5:1 compression should be no problem with midgrade fuel, but you may have to retard the timing if you run regular. If your car already uses a knock sensor, then you should be able to run on regular.

But keep in mind that with the current price of fuel, it makes little difference on what grade you use. In my area regular is $3.30 a gallon, and premium goes for $3.50 a gallon. A 15 gal. fill of regular costs $49.50, while a 15 gal. of premium costs $52.50. When comparing prices, $3.00 compared to $49.50 is not that much of a deal. Also consider the fact that when burning premium, the fuel mileage will be better because of more advanced spark, making the difference in cost even less.
 
  #4  
Old 08-13-2006, 12:04 AM
sewerrat's Avatar
2nd Gear member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 467
Default RE: LT1 compression ratio question

Thanks Pete, as always you manage to clear the air for me. So fast burn heads are the same as vortec heads? And do you recommend these over edelbrocks?
 
  #5  
Old 08-13-2006, 02:43 AM
z28pete's Avatar
Tech Droid
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North East PA
Posts: 9,215
Default RE: LT1 compression ratio question

From what I was told, and it may be a lot of BS, Edelbrock and GM cooperated on developing the fast burn heads. The Edelbrock are more expensive but they are aluminum instead of cast iron, and I belive they are available with the old small block bolt pattern, so you won't need to change the intake amnifold. Another feature is that aluminum heads can support more compression because aluminum is a better conductor of heat than cast iron, and the combustion chamber stays cooler.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1860Surveyor
Engine & Internal
1
02-08-2012 05:31 PM
350'sonly
70-81 General
37
10-14-2011 11:43 PM
rkiefer2
67-69 General
5
09-03-2010 07:39 AM
bobsmyuncle
General Tech
0
02-21-2010 06:43 AM
psycledad
93-02 V6 Tech
4
02-26-2007 07:05 PM



Quick Reply: LT1 compression ratio question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54 AM.