LT1/LT4 Tech 1993-1997

High mileage LT1 ??'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 25, 2014 | 08:53 PM
  #11  
cjgordon117's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
In the Staging Lanes
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 49
From: Flint, Michigan
Default

A 396 LT1 sounds really interesting... what would the downfalls be of going that big with the cubic inches? I'm sure that would cost a pretty penny too...
 
Old Aug 25, 2014 | 11:27 PM
  #12  
MKCoconuts's Avatar
4th Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,553
From: PA
Default

Downfalls is cost. Crank selection is limited as well. You're better off building a 383, it's cheaper than building a 396 with only a few less ponies and will still give you the torque you are looking for.
 
Old Aug 26, 2014 | 08:45 PM
  #13  
cjgordon117's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
In the Staging Lanes
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 49
From: Flint, Michigan
Default

But EVERYBODY has a 383... lol. But wanting to be different usually does end up being costly. Rough scetch of my build plan for the motor: Pacetter mid give headers, GMMG or Borla cat back, LE ported intake 1LE heads, LT4 Hot Cam, MSD Opti, wires, coil, metal intake elbow and whichever CAI I can find for cheap. Tune. That aught to get me close if not enough power... plus I'm getting 3.42's soon so those should help the kick a bit right?
 
Old Aug 26, 2014 | 09:58 PM
  #14  
MKCoconuts's Avatar
4th Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,553
From: PA
Default

Don't go with the LT4 cam. Have Llyod spec you a cam for his heads, you will be much happier. Another option to the 383 is a 355. That would allow you to use many of the stock parts, with the exception of the pistons. If you can put long tube headers on it do so, they will help more in the power department.
 
Old Aug 27, 2014 | 08:50 AM
  #15  
craby's Avatar
April 2011 ROTM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 22,001
From: Tokeland, Washington
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

unless your local emission laws dont allow it, use long tube headers. shorties dont do much for the lt1. have lloyd do your intake as well.
 
Old Aug 27, 2014 | 10:40 AM
  #16  
cjgordon117's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
In the Staging Lanes
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 49
From: Flint, Michigan
Default

I like the idea of the 355 better. LE can is the thing to get too Huh? N Yea craby I was planning on that. I was thinking of getting the Edlebrock intake, or DIY porting, but for only $200 that seems like the best investment. And I was planning on using the mid gives for price and ground clearance reasons. Roads are pretty bad around here.
 

Last edited by cjgordon117; Aug 27, 2014 at 10:43 AM.
Old Aug 30, 2014 | 10:39 AM
  #17  
craby's Avatar
April 2011 ROTM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 22,001
From: Tokeland, Washington
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

if you have the bucks for a set of kooks they have stock ground clearance. its the crossover pipe that makes the difference. some crossovers require a different tunnel brace.
 
Old Aug 30, 2014 | 10:48 AM
  #18  
craby's Avatar
April 2011 ROTM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 22,001
From: Tokeland, Washington
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

Name:  P8090004.jpg
Views: 2035
Size:  46.6 KB
this is the straight tunnel brace

Name:  P4120002.jpg
Views: 1982
Size:  67.0 KB
this is one i bought thinking i needed the extra clearance
 
Old Aug 30, 2014 | 11:35 PM
  #19  
Socom's Avatar
November 2010 ROTM
October 2011 ROTM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,104
From: Maryland
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

I bought the long tube version for my tunnel mount torque arm too thinking the same thing. I have like 2" of ground clearance
 
Old Aug 31, 2014 | 12:14 AM
  #20  
cjgordon117's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
In the Staging Lanes
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 49
From: Flint, Michigan
Default

Thanks for the pics craby. Long tubes it is then. Most I'm finding dont have hook ups for The EGR and AIR systems. It also seems common to remove these. No big whoop on the air pump... advantages/ disadvantages to removing the EGRi
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:36 AM.