LS Series Tech 1998-2002

Turbo vs. Supercharger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-26-2007, 11:02 AM
chevyboy4eva's Avatar
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2
Default Turbo vs. Supercharger

I have a 98 SS with an auto tranny and I'm looking out there to step up the power. I love the idea of a ProCharger but it is just too expesive. But then Turbo kits for Camaro are way cheaper and maybe, just maybe i can get more power out of the Turbocharger instead of the Supercharger. What do you think...?
 
  #2  
Old 06-26-2007, 11:36 AM
JD1969's Avatar
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,687
Default RE: Turbo vs. Supercharger

Since when are turbos cheaper than a supercharger?
 
  #3  
Old 06-26-2007, 12:16 PM
SpecterGT260's Avatar
Ninja Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Potato
Posts: 6,172
Default RE: Turbo vs. Supercharger

i think ur totally backwards. usually you can get more power from a turbo because its more efficient. however they are not only more expensive to buy, but more expensive to get set up properly and tuned safely. Superchargers are much less labor intensive when it comes to KEEPING the car running.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
96V6Camaro
93-02 V6 Tech
2
10-11-2021 09:41 PM
nateb
93-02 General
4
07-01-2008 01:00 AM
camaro maniac
Nitrous, Super Chargers, & Turbos
5
09-30-2007 09:27 AM
theonlyoneleft
93-02 V6 Tech
0
02-28-2006 06:54 PM



Quick Reply: Turbo vs. Supercharger



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:51 AM.