STS Turbo or Procharger
#1
![Default](https://camaroforums.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I planned on doing all motor but my buddy told me to look at the STS Turbo for my car. I'm not a big fan of turbos due to the fact that ricers use them more than anything. But I did a little research and the stats between the STS system and Procharger, the STS is the better of the 2 due to rwhp and $$$ and I also don't have to do alot to the motor to get more power from the Procharger. I was just wondering what you guys think of the STS Turbo compared to the Procharger. http://ststurbo.com/ls1_camaro_dyno, I can't find dyno results from the Procharger
#2
![Default](https://camaroforums.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Not liking turbos because ricers have them is pretty narrow minded, they are pound for pound the best type of forced induction you can get, but they are also more costly. That said of the two chioces you listed I would go with the Procharger, they make a great setup. I personally do not care for the STS systems, thier only benifit IMO is that they are easy to install. I have not seen one car with an STS system impress me, they always seem to have issues, of course it could be due to several factors. I run with some pretty serious LS1 guys and not one oif them has or has ever enven considered a STS system. If you want to go turbo, I suggest a conventional system.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post