93-02 V6 Tech V6 Camaro General Topics.

3.4L vs. v6 stang

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-26-2006, 11:43 PM
2fast4u's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 154
Default 3.4L vs. v6 stang

can a 3.4L stock take a stock or lightly modded v6 stang and second are all stangs v6's unless the say gt
 
  #2  
Old 11-27-2006, 12:13 AM
jhop16's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 182
Default RE: 3.4L vs. v6 stang

all mustangs with the horse/ with a rectangle down the middle ,as a emblam are v6's, ...Gts, Cobras,Saleens, are all v8...
i dont think you'd have much of a problem, but i'm not too familier with the 3.4L camaros, my 99 v6 (3.8L)..crushes v6 mustangs, i can even hold my own against some GT's(mainly early 90's GT's), which doesnt say much considering the 90's mustang GT's only have like 240 -250 hp stock, and my car has about 225 ..

what years teh mustang?... both auto? manual?.. and what mods does he have compared to what u have ?
 
  #3  
Old 11-27-2006, 01:59 AM
JaySan's Avatar
2nd Gear member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 375
Default RE: 3.4L vs. v6 stang

it might be a close race or the stang may walk all over your camaro. I have heard that the 3.4 puts out 190 hp and if the stang is a 4.0 you might lose depending the mods. but race it and tell us how it goes over
 
  #4  
Old 11-27-2006, 02:16 PM
Raidenvaga's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 118
Default RE: 3.4L vs. v6 stang

hookup your 3.4 with cold & exhaust , thenm tune it... I had an 93 Trans-am , 97 3.8 firebird , & 94 3.4 camaro... 3.4 is slow as hell but easy to hook and see the effect of labor to get it there
 
  #5  
Old 11-27-2006, 04:47 PM
2fast4u's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 154
Default RE: 3.4L vs. v6 stang

i dont have one inparticular im going to race but theres alotta kids around here that have ponys and i was just wondering if need be i could put them in there place
 
  #6  
Old 11-27-2006, 10:30 PM
AlfredB18's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location:
Posts: 106
Default RE: 3.4L vs. v6 stang


ORIGINAL: JaySan

it might be a close race or the stang may walk all over your camaro. I have heard that the 3.4 puts out 190 hp and if the stang is a 4.0 you might lose depending the mods. but race it and tell us how it goes over

Whoa. Let's not go overboard. A 3.4L puts out 190ish if it has the aluminum head swap done to it.

A 3.4L will take on a 3.8L from the early to mid 90s (150 HP), but newer 3.8L's and the 4.0L's are a reach (to put it nicely) with a 3.4L...
 
  #7  
Old 11-28-2006, 12:05 AM
Redneck97's Avatar
2nd Gear member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 544
Default RE: 3.4L vs. v6 stang

the 3.4l puts out 180ish hp and the 3.8L mustangs put out 150hp(96-98) 190ish (1999-2003?)
 
  #8  
Old 11-28-2006, 01:22 AM
chadimus06's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 102
Default RE: 3.4L vs. v6 stang

ive got a 94 3.4L camaro and i walk all over the ****stangs around here. i recently jus beat a 85 chevy short-wheel-base with a 350 bored 60 over. his dad jus spent like 8,000 on jus the motor by like 2 car links.
 
  #9  
Old 03-01-2007, 08:48 PM
94Camaromil's Avatar
Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 13
Default RE: 3.4L vs. v6 stang

You can beat him easy my friend was talking mad stuff about how his 99 v6 stang would take the maro but we got to the corner and i didn't kno if he would go but he did so he had about a car link headstart and i still smoked i got a 3.4 94 no mods
 
  #10  
Old 03-01-2007, 10:14 PM
badinfluenceRS's Avatar
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,702
Default RE: 3.4L vs. v6 stang

dead thread
 


Quick Reply: 3.4L vs. v6 stang



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:17 AM.