3.4 hp increase
#12
If you're looking to stay NA, you can bolt on the aluminum heads from a 3500. Much better flowing and will push compression up to 11.5:1 on stock gaskets. If you're looking for lower compression, you'll need the pistons from a 3400 fwd motor. Also, you'll shave 40lbs switching from iron to aluminum heads.
Working with this small a motor, subtraction is as important as addition. Lose as much weight as you can
Working with this small a motor, subtraction is as important as addition. Lose as much weight as you can
Last edited by inanitydefined; 06-02-2011 at 07:43 PM.
#13
Doing the 3500 head swap, you will have to use the 3400 intake on the 3500 heads. the 3500 intake will not fit under the cowl. Also you'll need to tune your PCM with a stand alone program such as megasquirt. also you will have to use the 3400 pistons unless you want to detonate (not good) Hahaha
#14
Doing the 3500 head swap, you will have to use the 3400 intake on the 3500 heads. the 3500 intake will not fit under the cowl. Also you'll need to tune your PCM with a stand alone program such as megasquirt. also you will have to use the 3400 pistons unless you want to detonate (not good) Hahaha
#15
Fourth Generation Moderator
October 2009 ROTM
October 2009 ROTM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 10,489
From: Eastern PA,
ROTM Winner's Club
Have you proven this? From my experance back in the day with wet systems when you built a No2 type motor you had to go insane on the exhaust flow. Since the exhaust port on a 3.4 is a choke point I did not think you would get much from it. Like a turbo the No2 will fill up the cylinder but it does not help at all emptying it.
#16
Fourth Generation Moderator
October 2009 ROTM
October 2009 ROTM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 10,489
From: Eastern PA,
ROTM Winner's Club
There is a sticky in this sub folder Start here: In that thread there is a Mod 3.4 area. Why in the world people think a redesigning a motor to combine major parts of another motor would fall under "decently cheap" is beyond me.
#17
Just a high-flow cat is noticeable -- do that with a cat-back -- post a pic of your air intake -- does it truly pull cold air outside the bay? You can do headers next.
Apart from HP, look into suspension improvements -- if you care about handling, you can make your car 100X more fun to drive -- shocks and sways to start with...
Apart from HP, look into suspension improvements -- if you care about handling, you can make your car 100X more fun to drive -- shocks and sways to start with...
#18
All you need is an EPROM (Erasable Programable Read Only Memory) burner -- and the knowledge of what settings to change -- not for the faint of heart, but certainly doable...
Camaros from 94 on use a PCM which has EEPROMs in them that hold the timing and fuel maps. This is not... Let me repeat that NOT, chipable. You can have the PCM tuned to the new engine settings at a Dyno shop or from some place like PCM4Less. The "chips" that are out there all they do is trick the PCM into thinking sensors are reading different and usually cause too much advance and a rich mix.
Massey
Massey
#19
Have you proven this? From my experance back in the day with wet systems when you built a No2 type motor you had to go insane on the exhaust flow. Since the exhaust port on a 3.4 is a choke point I did not think you would get much from it. Like a turbo the No2 will fill up the cylinder but it does not help at all emptying it.
#20
Fourth Generation Moderator
October 2009 ROTM
October 2009 ROTM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 10,489
From: Eastern PA,
ROTM Winner's Club
What is your times? Does the 3.4 run a Maf sensor? do you put the No2 in before or after the Maf sensor. On a dry system something has to trigger more fuel I am just wondering what that is.