LS1 suspension on a LT1?
#1
LS1 suspension on a LT1?
I've heard they ride better and handling is better too. Is it? By how much? Would it be worth it?
If it is worth it, there's this guy parting out his LS1 which I'll be buying the parts from. I'm just not sure which parts I should buy off of him though, is it just the shocks?
If it is worth it, there's this guy parting out his LS1 which I'll be buying the parts from. I'm just not sure which parts I should buy off of him though, is it just the shocks?
#3
I was reading Insideline's eview of the 1997 Camaro...
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...rticleId=44099
"...[for 1998] the suspension is getting retuned for better handling and a softer ride."
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...rticleId=44099
"...[for 1998] the suspension is getting retuned for better handling and a softer ride."
#5
ah, I see. I'm kinda desperate to do something for the ride cause every commute in my Z28 is a 'physical experience' haha...the lowering springs have definitely made it worse but i wanna find something better than stock to replace em with.
#6
you're into spring rates there. with lowering the car, you have to run higher spring rates to keep from bottoming out. the only real way you're going to soften the ride is by going with softer springs. shocks and struts are really only there to control body movement, they provide some spring force, but it's so minimal you'll barely notice it.
iirc, the LS1 F-Bodies had slightly lower spring rates up front because of the drop in weight over the front tires compared to the LT1. but stock height springs will only give your car a funky stance.
iirc, the LS1 F-Bodies had slightly lower spring rates up front because of the drop in weight over the front tires compared to the LT1. but stock height springs will only give your car a funky stance.
#7
you're into spring rates there. with lowering the car, you have to run higher spring rates to keep from bottoming out. the only real way you're going to soften the ride is by going with softer springs. shocks and struts are really only there to control body movement, they provide some spring force, but it's so minimal you'll barely notice it.
iirc, the LS1 F-Bodies had slightly lower spring rates up front because of the drop in weight over the front tires compared to the LT1. but stock height springs will only give your car a funky stance.
iirc, the LS1 F-Bodies had slightly lower spring rates up front because of the drop in weight over the front tires compared to the LT1. but stock height springs will only give your car a funky stance.
#8
Just replace your front struts and rear shocks with cheap ones and you will get that soft and floating ride you are looking for or buy a Ford. Also stop messing with the springs that was the start of your problem.
Last edited by blackz87; 06-30-2009 at 06:31 AM.
#9
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Eastern PA,
Posts: 10,352
If it was bottoming out due to a solid spring you would be correct. But the bottoming is the supension itself hitting the rubber stops. So low spings require a higher spring rate inorder to stop the car from hitting the stops.
#10
and the whole point is to not get that floaty ride. my impala had a floaty ride, it couldn't absorb bumps for crap. I mean how come a mercedes as old as my camaro can handle good AND have a good ride by a Camaro cant?
@Gorn: Oh, I see. Didn't know that.