What's the difference in a base Camaro and an RS?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 22, 2012 | 11:10 PM
  #1  
TheArtfulLodger's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 167
From: Greenville, SC
Default What's the difference in a base Camaro and an RS?

I'm looking at a 1999 Camaro RS, and I think the difference is that there's some suspension parts, but I am not sure. Can someone help me out?
 
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 11:41 AM
  #2  
Gorn's Avatar
Fourth Generation Moderator
October 2009 ROTM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 10,560
From: Eastern PA,
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

Its a trick question? GM did not make a RS in 99. In the 4th gen it made 96 and 97 and SLP made one 2001 and 2002.

History has show that the RS package is cosmedic only and really not engine or suspension related. In 96 and 97 it was the ground effects and rear fin and RS badges. SLP installed a CAI and exhaust on their version but i dont cont that since it was not GM. Sometime guys get the Y87 package confused with the RS because a lot of RS's have the Y87 but either could be order together or seprate. You could also buy the gound effects in 1999 but it was just that it did not come with the RS badges.
 

Last edited by Gorn; Feb 23, 2012 at 02:32 PM.
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 11:49 AM
  #3  
RPDRed6's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 131
From: Milwaukee, WI
Default

Ik the later fourth gen RS models had the tighter steering ratio, stripes, SLIP front grille, and dual exhaust that gave like +5hp...I'm probably missing a few things
 
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 11:58 AM
  #4  
libertyforall1776's Avatar
Overdrive Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,042
From: IL
Default

The tighter steering ratio was only with the Y87, AFAIK -- the way to check is RPO codes. Not all RS' got stripes, like my '02. There were other options, to upgrade to SS sways and others from SLP too, above the RS base package.

Also, I have never seen an RS that had an SLP CAI installed... That would have been done by an owner.

In later 4th Gens, the 3.42 rear gear was an RS feature, like in my '02.
 
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 12:02 PM
  #5  
z28pete's Avatar
Tech Droid
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,215
From: North East PA
Default

The 4th gen RS was a V6 with boy racer frills. For handling, performance and and a more sedate style the Z28 is a better choice. But some people like plastic cladding stuck on the bottom of the car, and each person sees things differently.
 

Last edited by z28pete; Feb 23, 2012 at 12:59 PM.
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 12:28 PM
  #6  
TheArtfulLodger's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 167
From: Greenville, SC
Default

Well that's...embarrassing. Glad I asked! The one I'm looking at does have the ground affects, but no badging, which should have made me suspicious about the RS part. Thanks for the info, nonetheless. I was always a bit fuzzy on that.

Originally Posted by z28pete
The 4th gen RS was a V6 with boy racer frills. For handling, performance and and a serious style the Z28 is a better choice. But some people like plastic cladding stuck on the bottom of the car.
I just don't have money to insure a V8 on my 20-year-old self. And I know how badly behaved I'd be with a Z.
 

Last edited by TheArtfulLodger; Feb 23, 2012 at 12:35 PM.
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 10:22 PM
  #7  
84corvettecamaro's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11
From: bama
Default

nothing really, unless you have the y 87 package in that case its:

4-wheel disc brakes
dual exhaust
3:42 rear end w/ posi.
14:4:1 Steering ratio(same as v8 cars)
only way to know for sure is to pull the rpo codes..
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tdspurrier
93-02 General
2
Nov 16, 2013 11:06 AM
Dirk88
93-02 Wheels, Tires and Exterior
3
Sep 24, 2012 06:00 PM
jmarti
67-69 General
1
May 18, 2009 02:26 AM
solei
2010+ General
9
Dec 5, 2008 08:34 PM
gap4annie
2010+ General
15
Sep 11, 2008 01:19 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:26 PM.