what does 1.9 or 2.0 60' mean

 

how fast you reach the 60' mark.

 

it really relates to how good of a launch you got. most cars should be able to hit a 2.0 60'.

 

so in other words, specter sucks at launching jk

 

specter was having a nervous breakdown about breaking the rear-end 100 miles from home [&:] thats a hell of a tow bill. This spring when I take it out im going to man up and actually launch that car tho

 

haha. and i'll laugh if it breaks.... just bring a buddy with you, and have him bring a trailer[8D]

 

No reason to make excuses for why your car didn't do any better... it's not supposed to. Go on acting like I'm crazy if you want, but under average conditions with an average driver, an LS1 is a mid 13 car. In fact, if anyone with a LS1 Camaro or Firebird A4 with the same mods as me (cai, exhaust system) wants to come to Kentucky and race, I'd be more than happy to put $500 down that they won't win by the 1 second they're supposed to win by according to the LS1 fanboys. I'm sure I won't get any takers on that.

 

Now them is fightin words....

 

its not an excuse for my car, its a justification for the numbers that I and many of the memers (even LT1 owners) quote. anyone with even a little track experience can tell you that .3 sec difference in the 60' will translate into about a half second at the end of the track, easily. im starting to get the feeling that you are taking LT1 best times vs LS1 average times. average times for lt1's are not 13.9, but the cars are certainly capable of that, even a 13.8, but i havent seen that personally on a stock car.

 

specter, go race him[8D]. and you can gimme the 500.