98 v6 camaro with issues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-03-2015, 10:12 AM
PO300's Avatar
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 3
Default 98 v6 camaro with issues

Posted on another site but didnt get any answers. I sure hope someone can help me out with this. I bought a 98 v6 camaro awhile back as a project. The car sometimes has po300 and p1870. However, i have changed the ICM (2 times), all 3 coils (2 times), the o2 sensors, ckp, cmp, egr, ect, fuel pump, injectors, not to mention the engine with a remanufactured one. sure i`ve missed something somewhere. The car doesn`t seem to be missing and I have tested spark with a spark tester. there`s no shaking, hesitation or anything that's normally associated with a misfire. the only time po300 is pending, or set, is when it runs 65-75 mph. Is it possible that p1870 is causing the ecm to think the car is missing when really its not? thanks in advance for any help.
 
  #2  
Old 05-03-2015, 04:39 PM
craby's Avatar
April 2011 ROTM
ROTM Winner's Club
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Tokeland, Washington
Posts: 21,645
Default

did you replace plug wires?
 
  #3  
Old 05-03-2015, 05:10 PM
PO300's Avatar
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 3
Default

yep, changed those and plugs. have changed almost everything ignition and fuel related.
 
  #4  
Old 05-03-2015, 05:54 PM
Gorn's Avatar
Fourth Generation Moderator
October 2009 ROTM
ROTM Winner's Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Eastern PA,
Posts: 10,357
Default

How quick does the 300 set? Will it set without the car being driven? I have not read about a transmission issue causing the 300 but I guess it is not impossible.

If I had to play the odds I would guess a connector issue. I had a P300 in my 96 that turned out to be the MAF sensor connector. I got lucky finding it. I bumped the harness and the engine stumbled and it reset the code. I tried to reproduce the stumble but could not. I figure for what it cost I solder in a new connector, that was a year ago. No misfire since. Since I drive highway miles I never felt the miss, but since it was a MAF issue it must have been a lean miss.
 
  #5  
Old 05-03-2015, 06:09 PM
PO300's Avatar
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 3
Default

hard to say because sometimes its like almost immediately set. then others i can go like 10 mi. before it set.

saw something on the gm diagnostic sheet for po300 that was dealing with the TCC (think it was step 23 or something). made start wondering if maybe the p1870 and 300 maybe connected. never heard of it myself that`s why im puzzled.
 
  #6  
Old 05-03-2015, 10:46 PM
craby's Avatar
April 2011 ROTM
ROTM Winner's Club
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Tokeland, Washington
Posts: 21,645
Default

yes they could be. the misfire causes the ecm to turn off the tcc lock. dont know if that would set that code though.
 
  #7  
Old 05-05-2015, 06:51 PM
Gorn's Avatar
Fourth Generation Moderator
October 2009 ROTM
ROTM Winner's Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Eastern PA,
Posts: 10,357
Default

Originally Posted by PO300
hard to say because sometimes its like almost immediately set. then others i can go like 10 mi. before it set.

saw something on the gm diagnostic sheet for po300 that was dealing with the TCC (think it was step 23 or something). made start wondering if maybe the p1870 and 300 maybe connected. never heard of it myself that`s why im puzzled.
The way the system detects a random misfire is it looks at how smooth the engine accelerates/idles. If the PCM does not see a smooth acceleration it assume you have a misfire or a weak cylinder. If there was something in the transmission cause a quick grab and release then I could see the PCM thinking it was a miss. The fact that P300 set while it was not in gear even once kind of eliminates that as a possibility. I guess while it is out of gear the torque converter could be grabbing, but I find that hard to believe. Torque converters fail but 99% of the time once they start grabbing they have a very limited life its not something that hangs on for months with no change.

You need a data logger. Clear the codes and drive with the data log on and check all sensor data for a change right before the code sets.
 
  #8  
Old 06-06-2015, 09:08 AM
mfmfim's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 196
Default

This could be as simple as a cracked spark plug.
 
  #9  
Old 06-06-2015, 12:02 PM
95 camaro 406's Avatar
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: troy NH
Posts: 2,315
Default

what about the distributor I am thinking you changed it I would have,i forgot its the v6 so not sure where its at
 

Last edited by 95 camaro 406; 06-07-2015 at 11:52 AM.
  #10  
Old 06-07-2015, 09:24 AM
mfmfim's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 196
Default

The 98 v6 doesn't have a distributor cap.
 


Quick Reply: 98 v6 camaro with issues



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56 AM.