82-92 V8 Tech V8 Camaro General Topics.

Thinking about getting one.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-01-2010, 01:20 AM
Dillon5224's Avatar
In the Staging Lanes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 36
Default Thinking about getting one.

I have my 96, but I've been wanting an older car as a project car. Something I can just make obnoctuously loud and pretty fast. Thinkin low geared like 4:56s or something. Exhaust cut off at headers, that kinda thing. i don't need backpressure do i? lol. Is this a worthy investment? After a while It'd be nice to have racing seats, new interior and paint and everything. I just finally want a project car and was thinkin this could be it.

Are these camaro's right around 1990 good or should i think of something else?
 
  #2  
Old 03-01-2010, 07:27 PM
microkid's Avatar
March 2011 ROTM
Technical User
ROTM Winner's Club
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Biglerville, PA
Posts: 2,615
Default

if you want that, id say go pre 1985. then you can use whatever carb you want. backpressure is never needed on an engine, just the fuel ratio corrected for more air flow
 
  #3  
Old 03-02-2010, 03:03 PM
djs383's Avatar
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 819
Default

The older the better as emission laws get much more relaxed. I have been having a heck of a time getting an 87 iroc through emissions.

As far as cheap, there is absolutely no such thing. I have well over a year and a half in a resto and I bet I'll have another 6 months before it is legal and drivable.....I haven't even done the interior yet. Its 10 months in the body shop was not cheap either. THey take a lot of work/money/time to make into a barn burner. In fact I've taken a break from it and started working on a 67 mustang. The mustang is 10X easier to work on!
 
  #4  
Old 03-02-2010, 04:59 PM
Dillon5224's Avatar
In the Staging Lanes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 36
Default

im lookin for a cheaper car, not cheaper mods lol. And emissions isnt anything. there's no tests, nobody cares. its wyoming!! lol 50% of vehicles just are huge diesels that can smoke out blocks.
 
  #5  
Old 03-02-2010, 05:41 PM
1971BB427's Avatar
Second Generation Moderator
Feb 2010 ROTM winner
Jan 2013 ROTM winner
ROTM Winner's Club
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 9,097
Default

I can't agree with no back pressure needed. Back pressure is definitely needed for any street driven car. If the plan is an all out race car then back pressure is not needed, or even wanted, but even then the entire intake and exhaust sytem needs to be correctly sized to not move more exhaust out of the engine than what air/fuel is moved into the engine.
If zero back pressure was optimum then heads would not be designed with larger intake valves over exhaust valves. Almost all street or strip designed heads have larger intake valves and runners vs. exhaust valves and runners.
When I was racing my Camaro I found that it ran much better with a header pipe off the collector vs. straight off the collector open. Yes, I could have jetted the carb large enough to overcome the lack of back pressure, but all I would have accomplished was using more fuel to get equal performance.
If this will be a street only car, then I'd plan on either free flowing exhaust, or straight pipes that are internally baffled. Depending on what engine, you can go either 2.5" or 3" exhaust.
As for the year, if it's going to be highly modified, then the year hardly matters. You can build whatever you want from the most reasonably priced donor Camaro. There's a pretty neat '89 with a blown 502 running around town here that I see at cruises in the summer.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gfrench
Nitrous, Super Chargers, & Turbos
10
08-25-2011 10:29 AM
94z28chevy
82-92 V6 Tech
1
03-15-2008 03:56 AM
jimidude87
82-92 V8 Tech
5
02-24-2008 01:13 AM
CamaroTomRS
93-02 V6 Tech
12
11-15-2007 07:49 PM



Quick Reply: Thinking about getting one.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 AM.