You are just confirming your own AIRHEAD reply about a "Metric Tranny" on American car. Dumber then DUMB you are.

Why not reply with a senible answer on the Metric Tranny?????

Glad you are the president of my fan club, at least I know my remarks are read.

 

Who's the dumb one? You are obviously confusing an American made component that's built with metric parts with a component that's foreign made. NOBODY made the suggestion that the trans was foreign made. Read the lines, not between them.

 

The above reponse is known as CYA reply. In case you dont know "Cover Your A--".

 

NOPE, wrong again. I only give answers when I know the answers, try it sometime.

 

Another CYA reply, go back to the first POSTS... and try afgain.

 

to get back on topic,,, so the 250 is even lighter duty than the 200? seems like the metric is used to identify the trany as a light duty trans more than anything.

 

Yes, back on topic. I'm done trying to reason with unreasonable.
Essentially, the 200 is a metric version (and I didn't say foreign) of the T350 that has been physically lightened, by using lighter weight alloys on the internal parts. But that made them weaker and prone to failure when stuck behind a V8.
The 250 is a revamped T350, with an adjuster band in place of the intermediate clutch pack. The 200 is the weaker of the two. T350 is the way to go between all three.

 

Wow, I didn't know this would start a war..LOL Thanks for the information guys!

 

Should I get a turbo 350 or the 700R4 tranny?

 

700r4 u gona build it up a bit?