alignment specs, help? suspension geometry?
#1
alignment specs, help? suspension geometry?
i just got my car aligned. my steering wheel is still cocked to the left, it may have been pulled off before, but thats not the concern
how many people know actual camber specs? i know from a bit of r/c car racing and video games that a lil bit of negative camber is good for cornering. however, on my printout of the specs shows that is set at .4* +. its slightly noticeable when the car is parked that that top of the tires are angled outwards. i know that positive camber is horrible for cornering as the tire is already putting the weight onto the outside edge of the tire as it folds over. however, since these cars arent double wishbone, does the camber angle change as the wheel goes up? i would think that the vehicle moving and braking would compress the suspension, changing it back to a negative camber.
now that my car has been aligned, it tracks straighter and behaves better, and has equal snap in either direction (used to prefer left turns to rights). however, the front doesnt feel as planted in the corners as it used to. now im not haulin *** into turns that it would understeer, but it just doesnt feel the same. should i have it set to about 0* camber, or a tad negative?
how many people know actual camber specs? i know from a bit of r/c car racing and video games that a lil bit of negative camber is good for cornering. however, on my printout of the specs shows that is set at .4* +. its slightly noticeable when the car is parked that that top of the tires are angled outwards. i know that positive camber is horrible for cornering as the tire is already putting the weight onto the outside edge of the tire as it folds over. however, since these cars arent double wishbone, does the camber angle change as the wheel goes up? i would think that the vehicle moving and braking would compress the suspension, changing it back to a negative camber.
now that my car has been aligned, it tracks straighter and behaves better, and has equal snap in either direction (used to prefer left turns to rights). however, the front doesnt feel as planted in the corners as it used to. now im not haulin *** into turns that it would understeer, but it just doesnt feel the same. should i have it set to about 0* camber, or a tad negative?
#3
RE: alignment specs, help? suspension geometry?
i saw that as well, but they recomend that if you plan on doing a lot of fast cornering. i dont intend to go racing like that on back roads (thats what the geo is for), mine is a daily driver with occasional weekend racing/cruising
#4
RE: alignment specs, help? suspension geometry?
ive taken some spirited turns the last few weeks, and there is some noticeable wear on the outside right along the sipes, but barely any on the inside. i dont think they will re-align it for free, so ill wait until another time before i get it set to -.5* unless my neighbor has the tools i can do it, which he might.
#5
RE: alignment specs, help? suspension geometry?
On my 84 these are the specs my alignment shop set the car at. (I found an old reciept)
LT Camber = + 0 6/8 degree
LT Caster = +3 3/4
LT KPI/SAI = 14 1/2
RT Camber = +0 1/8
RT Caster = +4 3/4
RT KPI/SAI = 15 1/2
Total Toe = +0 1/32
My tires wore on the outside but that was from making sharp u-turns every day going into works parking lot. Camaros will do that.
LT Camber = + 0 6/8 degree
LT Caster = +3 3/4
LT KPI/SAI = 14 1/2
RT Camber = +0 1/8
RT Caster = +4 3/4
RT KPI/SAI = 15 1/2
Total Toe = +0 1/32
My tires wore on the outside but that was from making sharp u-turns every day going into works parking lot. Camaros will do that.
#6
RE: alignment specs, help? suspension geometry?
bringin back an old post but.....
i bottomed out the strut plates to set the camber (moved inward maybe half an inch), and the negative camber is just visually noticeable compared to the rear tires vs. the strongly noticeable positive camber. i still have to balance out the left side, but it handles so much better. it tends to wander a bit more, but the cornering is much better, even at low speeds.
i bottomed out the strut plates to set the camber (moved inward maybe half an inch), and the negative camber is just visually noticeable compared to the rear tires vs. the strongly noticeable positive camber. i still have to balance out the left side, but it handles so much better. it tends to wander a bit more, but the cornering is much better, even at low speeds.
#8
RE: alignment specs, help? suspension geometry?
i meant the left side has more camber than the right. but my steering wheel isnt straight. can i straighten it myself?
#9
RE: alignment specs, help? suspension geometry?
ORIGINAL: microkid
bringin back an old post but.....
i bottomed out the strut plates to set the camber (moved inward maybe half an inch), and the negative camber is just visually noticeable compared to the rear tires vs. the strongly noticeable positive camber. i still have to balance out the left side, but it handles so much better. it tends to wander a bit more, but the cornering is much better, even at low speeds.
bringin back an old post but.....
i bottomed out the strut plates to set the camber (moved inward maybe half an inch), and the negative camber is just visually noticeable compared to the rear tires vs. the strongly noticeable positive camber. i still have to balance out the left side, but it handles so much better. it tends to wander a bit more, but the cornering is much better, even at low speeds.
#10
RE: alignment specs, help? suspension geometry?
i know that it affects the other two parameters, but hasnt effected the handling of the car at all, except that it greatly increased cornering. before, the front end would skate on just off ramps, and the outer edge of the tire is already badly worn just from straight line driving. i dont take it into the corners fast because of the way it felt. i may be a bit too much camber for right now, but im still adjusting it. once i find the best inbetween on the camber settings, i can adjust the toe and caster. i picked up a suspension book, and im going off the specs given as a general guideline in a camaro performance book. plus im getting the help of a neighbor who races and he has some tools to double check everything.