Sandblast or chemical dip

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-21-2009, 02:15 PM
Confused Camaro Guy's Avatar
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1
Default Sandblast or chemical dip

Hello, I have a 1969 SS Camaro that I have had for almost 20 years. The car runs great but its in need of restoration now. It was originally a North Carolina car and has a lot of rust on the floorboard. For years I have managed to patch up the floorboard, but I have kids now and I'm worried about the floorboard giving away under them. I just started disassembling the car to restore all the metal. My question is which is better sandblasting or getting it chemically dipped? Which one is more expensive? Also how much prep do you have to do for either. I know you have to get the car down to bare metal only, but do you have to sand any of the paint off first. I have never restored a car before, so I know I'm probably going to have a lot more questions. Thanks for any input.
 
  #2  
Old 07-21-2009, 03:14 PM
Camaro 69's Avatar
Senior Moderator
January 2010 ROTM Winner
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The 'Burbs of Chicago
Posts: 18,306
Default

Neither!
Sand blasting is a bad idea for panels that show. Stay in one place just a little too long, and the sand will build enough heat to will warp the panel, leaving you with divots.
Chemical stripping is just a plain old mess. Plus you then want to make sure the metal is good and clean and neutralized so you don't have any paint compatibility issues.
A couple of options are either plastic media blasting, or soda blasting (baking, not soda pop). Soda is supposed to be a better way, because it neutralizes the metal as it goes. I've had a Vette plastic media blasted. It took it down to the primer, then it bounced off the glass body panels from there. I haven't had a metal body done for comparison sake, so it could take it down closer to bare metal. Either way you go, you'll have some finish sanding to do. And blasting won't remove bondo, if the car has any.
 
  #3  
Old 07-21-2009, 08:32 PM
orocker's Avatar
December 2011 ROTM
Santas Little Helper
ROTM Winner's Club
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Casselberry, FL
Posts: 1,242
Default

I agree with camaro69. I had mine soda/media blasted. Did a fab job. Cost me $500. I took the front end apart and pulled the motor and all the wiring. Basically I took it down to the barebones and then had it hauled away but thats all we did. Check out the 1st page or 2 of my project thread and you will see what mine looked like after the blasting.

https://camaroforums.com/forum/67-69-projects-106/my-69-camaro-project-18688/
 
  #4  
Old 08-04-2009, 12:01 PM
1969 SS's Avatar
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,459
Default

media blasting and chemical dipping are both great options, but they both have their pros and cons

for the average guy, media blasting is the best option though
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
italiafutbol07
LT1/LT4 Tech
4
01-02-2011 01:31 PM



Quick Reply: Sandblast or chemical dip



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:28 PM.