1967 Camaro SS and 1967 Camaro RS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 2, 2009 | 11:04 AM
  #11  
Gorn's Avatar
Fourth Generation Moderator
October 2009 ROTM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 10,560
From: Eastern PA,
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

This is what you are looking for, This is not mine just a random on I found on the net

Name:  tag.jpg
Views: 3057
Size:  7.2 KB
 
Old Sep 2, 2009 | 11:23 AM
  #12  
cplthomas's Avatar
HELP ME TOM CRUISE
Yaaarrrrrr
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,010
From: Northern VA (but still in the south)
Default

Welcome to the thread gorn...
 
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 07:46 PM
  #13  
minex's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
In the Staging Lanes
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 86
Default

The restoration has begun.

When I originally brought the car home, it looked like this. My wife had no issues with the car :

Name:  IMG_0527.jpg
Views: 1008
Size:  97.1 KB

The car now looks like this. My wife almost **** a brick when she saw it. She's no longer sure about this project of mine.

Name:  IMG_0557.jpg
Views: 1014
Size:  106.0 KB

I've also removed the passenger door and passenger front fender because those will need to be replaced. I've already located replacements and will pick those up tomorrow.

Name:  IMG_0550.jpg
Views: 908
Size:  127.6 KB

Name:  IMG_0543.jpg
Views: 1034
Size:  218.6 KB

Name:  IMG_0562.jpg
Views: 912
Size:  82.1 KB

After removing the valance, I found that it was warped and bent. I'll end up replacing that too :

Name:  IMG_0545.jpg
Views: 960
Size:  131.7 KB

I've also removed the heads from the engine and have sent those to a machinist to look at. I'm also debating if I want to replace the radiator support. The passenger side bracket has been completely rusted through, but I can probably jury rig it so that I can bolt it back onto the frame. The rest of the support looks fine. A new radiator support from NPD costs $70.
 
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 07:48 PM
  #14  
minex's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
In the Staging Lanes
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 86
Default

Gorn was right. The car did, indeed, come with a 350, not a 396. Oh well. The 396 is staying in. The question now is why does the car have an RS badge when its an RS/SS as indicated by the trim? Here's a picture of the trim :

Name:  IMG_0552.jpg
Views: 983
Size:  138.6 KB
 

Last edited by minex; Sep 13, 2009 at 08:00 PM.
Old Sep 13, 2009 | 08:49 PM
  #15  
Gorn's Avatar
Fourth Generation Moderator
October 2009 ROTM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 10,560
From: Eastern PA,
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

It must have been when they painted it. There was a lot of bad info floating around back in the 80 about badges. COuld be someone thought it had the wrong badges and they "Fixed it". Like you had said before the hood vents are also incorrect.

I decoded it before I saw you had already done it.

04C = 3rd week in April
67-12437= 1967 (12)=Camaro (4)= Standard interior (37)= Coupe
760-Z = Black standard bucks (No head rests)
W= Tinted Windsheild
Los= Los Angeles
K-K paint=Emerald Turquoise/B
_____
2L= 4 speed M20 or M21
G= Console
R=Rear speakers
_____
3L= Rally Sport (Woot!)
S= Interior Décor Grp
4P= SS (Woot 2!)
The SS part gets a little tricky cause 4P is for the 350 but it says some of the early 396s where 4P but it says by January of 67 all 396’s where 4L or 4K. Meaning any car made in April of 67 with a 4p is a 350SS.

But hey its a true RS/SS
 

Last edited by Gorn; Sep 13, 2009 at 09:02 PM.
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 05:23 AM
  #16  
Gorn's Avatar
Fourth Generation Moderator
October 2009 ROTM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 10,560
From: Eastern PA,
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

This could explain it. It explains why you had the RS badges and why it does not have the correct hood.

Usage of the 4P code with the L30/M20 is believed to have started in the late December 1966 / January 1967 timeframe

L30/M20 Camaro
327ci-275HP, 4-speed (base V8 price + $331.00 in 1968, with N10 dual exhaust & PY5 F70x14 tires)
While the L48 package got top billing, the less-publicized optional upgrade to the base 327 engine, RPO L30, boosted performance of the base 327ci V8 from 210HP to 275HP. When the L30 engine was combined with the M20 4-speed manual transmission option, and only in this case, Chevrolet considered the L30 engine to have crossed the line into high-performance territory, and added three of the seven SS high-performance components: the rear axle, rear springs (or radius rod in 67), and rear brake proportioning valve. In addition, two of the remaining four SS components could be added via inexpensive option additions, resulting in similar matches to the first five of the seven SS-350 performance component categories.
 
Old Sep 16, 2009 | 08:38 AM
  #17  
minex's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
In the Staging Lanes
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 86
Default

Nice. Thanks for the information. That makes sense. I can see someone replacing the engine, but it seems odd replacing an SS badge with an RS badge.
 
Old Sep 16, 2009 | 09:40 AM
  #18  
Gorn's Avatar
Fourth Generation Moderator
October 2009 ROTM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 10,560
From: Eastern PA,
ROTM Winner's Club
Default

This is good info to have. If you ever decide to return the car to stock numbers correct. My understanding is the L30/M20 cars are worth as much and the 350SS and there are less of them.
 
Old Sep 16, 2009 | 11:00 AM
  #19  
Camaro 69's Avatar
Senior Moderator
January 2010 ROTM Winner
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 18,306
From: The 'Burbs of Chicago
Default

Here's a link to an interesting write-up that I've posted before: 1967-68 L30/M20
 
Old Sep 16, 2009 | 03:45 PM
  #20  
minex's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
In the Staging Lanes
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 86
Default

Originally Posted by Camaro 69
Here's a link to an interesting write-up that I've posted before: 1967-68 L30/M20
I just finished reading that article. If the car is actually an L30/M20, wow, what a find! It would almost make me want to rip out the 396 and find a matching number 327...
 

Last edited by minex; Sep 16, 2009 at 03:47 PM.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:38 AM.