93-02 V6 Tech V6 Camaro General Topics.

supercharger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-09-2010, 10:10 PM
BasicConcepts's Avatar
Overdrive Member
Technical User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Greenville, South Carolina
Posts: 4,597
Default supercharger

i wanted to turbo my car but everyone says the block wont take it but will she be able to take a superchearger and is there a supercharger out there for a 95 3.4L
 
  #2  
Old 04-09-2010, 11:21 PM
Lilspleen's Avatar
In the Staging Lanes
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 79
Default

not to familar with the 3.4 but i would say sell it and at least get a 3.8 or just keep the 3.4 for a daily driver
 
  #3  
Old 04-09-2010, 11:37 PM
CamaroKid16's Avatar
2nd Gear member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Posts: 478
Default

The 3.4 is imo one of the worst engines built by gm in a long time. The fwd 3.4 is actually a better engine to try and make power in. I drive a 3.4 myself so dont get to offensive. lol But Lilspleen is 100% correct. Getting a 3.8 is going to be a much better platform to mod then a 3.4 and still keep your insurance far under a v8.

It is extremely (and i can't stress EXTREMELY enough) hard to find performance parts for the 3.4. I have never heard of there being any supercharger system out there for the 3.4 platform, muchless turbochargers for the it either.

But i can't also crush a guys dream to have a very one off car. All i'm saying is there are several much better avenues to go in your quest to make power.
 
  #4  
Old 04-10-2010, 01:50 AM
BasicConcepts's Avatar
Overdrive Member
Technical User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Greenville, South Carolina
Posts: 4,597
Default

well the thing is is this car is in (for 15 years old) what i and a bunch of ppl would call showroom condition the car is fckin mint what about a 3.4 to a 3.8 swap then mod it
 
  #5  
Old 04-10-2010, 07:01 AM
Gorn's Avatar
Fourth Generation Moderator
October 2009 ROTM
ROTM Winner's Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Eastern PA,
Posts: 10,462
Default

Originally Posted by BasicConcepts
well the thing is is this car is in (for 15 years old) what i and a bunch of ppl would call showroom condition the car is fckin mint what about a 3.4 to a 3.8 swap then mod it
Not worth it, do a search. It would be more work then installing a Lt1 from a 94. GM changed their computer system in 96. Connecting a OBD2 motor in a OBD1 system is not a simple task even for a tech.
 
  #6  
Old 04-10-2010, 07:17 AM
CamaroKid16's Avatar
2nd Gear member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Posts: 478
Default

If you've got a mint 3.4 id say leave it alone. I am 99% sure you will not find anybody on here that will tell you that trying to mod or engine swap this is a good idea. Unless you're going to use a stand alone ecu, like myself later on down the road.
 
  #7  
Old 04-10-2010, 11:06 AM
BasicConcepts's Avatar
Overdrive Member
Technical User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Greenville, South Carolina
Posts: 4,597
Default

thanx guys
 
  #8  
Old 04-18-2010, 08:39 AM
Masospaghetti's Avatar
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 126
Default

^ Yeah, enjoy your car the way it is, accept that its not super fast, and save for a V8 monster for the future.
 
  #9  
Old 04-18-2010, 07:39 PM
BasicConcepts's Avatar
Overdrive Member
Technical User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Greenville, South Carolina
Posts: 4,597
Default

what about using the heads off the FWD ive heard thats a good power up
 
  #10  
Old 04-20-2010, 12:44 AM
MusicMan's Avatar
The Jazz Man
ROTM Winner's Club
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: St. Helens, Oregon
Posts: 2,237
Default

Originally Posted by CamaroKid16
The 3.4 is imo one of the worst engines built by gm in a long time.



Here, e-mail John and ask him what ya can do on the engine, the man knows those engines very well. I've seen a few 60* engines put down more than a 3.8 can.

http://www.60inclusive.com/index.php?page=contact.php
 


Quick Reply: supercharger



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:06 AM.