Eclipse GT vs Camaro V6 Loss
#11
RE: Eclipse GT vs Camaro V6 Loss
ORIGINAL: fiad06
They had 215 hp but they had 285 tq, so they should edge a v6 camaro out...i think there lighter too, im not sure....You should be side by side by him because that car is around 11 years old.
ORIGINAL: sooperdewd
But doenst the V6 for the camaro, isnt it suppose to range in HP from 200-225 becuase I raced a green 95 Mustang GT as well he took off the time first but we were side by side the entire time.
But doenst the V6 for the camaro, isnt it suppose to range in HP from 200-225 becuase I raced a green 95 Mustang GT as well he took off the time first but we were side by side the entire time.
They had 215 hp but they had 285 tq, so they should edge a v6 camaro out...i think there lighter too, im not sure....You should be side by side by him because that car is around 11 years old.
well fine i drive a 97' and ive almost beatin a 95 mustang. theres a 2year dif lol :-P
#14
RE: Eclipse GT vs Camaro V6 Loss
Mustang arent slow....there just not as fast as maros and trans ams.....The ls1 do have a 1.1 litre bigger engine then our 4.6...
I guess ford doesnt find a need to beef up the mustangs that much, no offense but they sell more than the maros and firebirds, and we are a significant amount slower.
I guess ford doesnt find a need to beef up the mustangs that much, no offense but they sell more than the maros and firebirds, and we are a significant amount slower.
#16
RE: Eclipse GT vs Camaro V6 Loss
ORIGINAL: fiad06
Mustang arent slow....there just not as fast as maros and trans ams.....The ls1 do have a 1.1 litre bigger engine then our 4.6...
I guess ford doesnt find a need to beef up the mustangs that much, no offense but they sell more than the maros and firebirds, and we are a significant amount slower.
Mustang arent slow....there just not as fast as maros and trans ams.....The ls1 do have a 1.1 litre bigger engine then our 4.6...
I guess ford doesnt find a need to beef up the mustangs that much, no offense but they sell more than the maros and firebirds, and we are a significant amount slower.
#17
RE: Eclipse GT vs Camaro V6 Loss
ORIGINAL: fiad06
Mustang arent slow....there just not as fast as maros and trans ams.....The ls1 do have a 1.1 litre bigger engine then our 4.6...
I guess ford doesnt find a need to beef up the mustangs that much, no offense but they sell more than the maros and firebirds, and we are a significant amount slower.
Mustang arent slow....there just not as fast as maros and trans ams.....The ls1 do have a 1.1 litre bigger engine then our 4.6...
I guess ford doesnt find a need to beef up the mustangs that much, no offense but they sell more than the maros and firebirds, and we are a significant amount slower.
#18
RE: Eclipse GT vs Camaro V6 Loss
Im going to have to go with the price thing, I know when I fill up with gas even or any little thing I do in my Camaro I get some chill people come up and start talking to me and asking me questions and whatnot. But I have a buddy with a mustang, and nobody says squat, exept why would you do anything to that? They sell more because more are produced and more on the road and they fall apart so people sell em for cheap. And generally I have seen where I am in Denver (rich suburbs) when the 40 year olds hit thier mid life crisis they pop the money into a Mustang.(Convertable)